The Armenian Question and the Wartime Fate of Thearmenians as Documented by the Officials of the Ottomanempire's World War I Allies
Germany Andaustria–hungary
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8969835 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Vahakn N Dadrian (Institute of Zoology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 59-85 |
| Publication date | 2002-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal Middle East Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-7438 • E-ISSN: 1471-6380 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0020743802001034 |
| OpenAlex | W1524799050 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 16 |
The wartime fate of the Ottoman Empire's Armenian minority continues to be controversial. The debate in the main revolves around the causes and nature of that fate. Some historians have alleged that what is involved is centrally organized mass murder—or, to use contemporary terminology, genocide. This school of thought maintains that the Ottoman authorities were waiting for a suitable opportunity to undertake the wholesale liquidation of the empire's Armenian population, and the outbreak of World War I provided that opportunity. The Committee of Union and Progress (CUP, or Unionists), who controlled the Ottoman government, they argue further, did in fact undertake this liquidation under cover of the war. 1 Others, however, dispute these assertions, especially that of genocidal intent. This group maintains that Armenian acts of disloyalty, subversion, and insurrection in wartime forced the central government to order, for purposes of relocation, the deportation of large sections of the Armenian population. According to this argument, apart from those who were killed in “intercommunal” clashes—that is, a “civil war”—the bulk of the Armenian losses resulted from the severe hardships associated with poorly administered measures of deportations, including exhaustion, sickness, starvation, and epidemics. In other words, this school of thought holds that the Ottoman Empire, in the throes of an existential war, had no choice but to protect itself by resorting to drastic methods; therefore, the tragic fate of the Armenians must be understood in the context of the dire conditions of World War I. 2 These views are encapsulated in the formula that the noted Middle East historian Bernard Lewis has used—namely, the desperate conditions of “an embattled empire.” 3
Ancient history · Armenian · Context (archaeology · Deportation · Economic history · Expansionism · Genocide · Immigration · Political science · Politics · Population · Sociology · Spanish Civil War · Demography · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · History · Law · World Wars: History, Literature, and Impact
Children as victims of genocide
The missing “fifth column”
The Armenian Genocide of 1915 from a Neutral Small State's Perspective
Cycles of Genocide, Stories of Denial
Armenian Christians and Turkish Muslims
The Armenian Question and the Wartime Fate of Thearmenians as Documented by the Officials of the Ottomanempire's World War I Allies
Genocide
Eagles on the Crescent
History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey
Ottoman Imperialism During the Reformation
La Question armenienne
The Middle East
The Splendid Blond Beast
The Armenian Question and the Wartime Fate of Thearmenians as Documented by the Officials of the Ottomanempire's World War I Allies
The Naim-Andonian Documents on the World War I Destruction of Ottoman Armenians
Armenia
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 2002 - 2013 (12) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |