Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Survey of Current Problems in Meta-Analysis

Discussion from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Inter-Port Work Group on Literature Review/Meta-Analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID9097782
AuthorsVic Hasselblad (corresponding author), Frederick Mosteller, Benjamin Littenberg (0000-0002-7647-1808), ThOMAS C CHALMERS, M G Myriam Hunink (0000-0002-2942-2798), Judith A Turner (0000-0002-0519-3521), Sally C Morton (RAND Corporation), Paula Diehr (University of Washington), John B Wong (0000-0003-4203-9010, corresponding author), Neil R Powe (0000-0003-2347-3620)
Year1995
Volume33
Issue2
Pages202-220
Publication date1995-02-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-199533020-00007
PMID7837827
OpenAlexW2088940783, W4246870948
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited5

The United States Agency for Health Care Policy and Research brought together representatives from each of the Patient Outcomes Research Teams (PORTs) as the Inter-PORT Meta-Analysis Work Group. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss a wide range of problems the panel had encountered in the area of meta-analysis. Several actual problems were presented, and tentative solutions to those problems were given. The PORTs had to consider issues such as quality assessment, survival analysis, rare events, sensitivity and specificity, and random effects models. The solutions presented represent the methods used by several researchers who are active in the area of meta-analysis

Agency (philosophy) · Health care · Management science · Meta-analysis · Operations research · Outcome (game theory) · Political science · Port (circuit theory) · Quality (philosophy) · Random effects model · Risk analysis (engineering) · Sociology · Work (physics) · Computer Science · Dialysis and Renal Disease Management · Engineering · Frailty in Older Adults · Mathematics · Medicine · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

  • Alternative Methods for Formal Literature Review and Meta-Analysis in AHCPR Patient Outcomes Research Teams

    Neil R Powe, Judith A Turner et al.•Medical Care•1994

  • Effect-Size Indices for Dichotomized Outcomes in Meta-Analysis.

    Julio Sanchez-Meca, Julio Sánchez‐Meca et al.•Psychological Methods•2003

  • Breast-feeding and cognitive development

    Open Access•JAMES W ANDERSON, 安彦 脇坂 et al.•American Journal of Clinical…•1999

  • Meta-Analysis of 2 × 2 Tables

    Open Access•Julio Sanchez-Meca, Julio Sánchez‐Meca et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2001

  • Caffeine intake and pregnancy outcomes

    Open Access•Iná S Santos, Cesar G Victora et al.•Cadernos de Saude Publica•1998

  • Exploratory data analysis

    John Wilder Tukey•Exploratory data analysis•1977

  • Methods of Meta-Analysis

    Frank L Schmidt, John Hunter et al.•Methods of Meta-Analysis•2004

  • Meta-analysis in clinical trials

    Open Access•Rebecca DerSimonian, Nan M Laird et al.•Controlled Clinical Trials•1986

  • Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect size and Related Estimators

    Open Access•Larry V Hedges•Journal of Educational Statistics•1981

  • Alternative Methods for Formal Literature Review and Meta-Analysis in AHCPR Patient Outcomes Research Teams

    Neil R Powe, Judith A Turner et al.•Medical Care•1994

Citations per year0.16
Citation span1994 - 2003 (10)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae