Adverse Clinical Events Among Medicare Beneficiaries Using Antipsychotic Drugs
Linking Health Insurance Benefits and Clinical Needs
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9100570 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Vicki Fung (0000-0001-8078-5431, Kaiser Permanente, corresponding author), Mary Price (Kaiser Permanente), Alisa B Busch (0000-0002-1828-9098, McLean Hospital), Mary Beth Landrum (0000-0001-5055-8473, Harvard University), Bruce Fireman (0000-0003-1652-985X, Kaiser Permanente), Andrew A Nierenberg (0000-0003-2897-0458, Massachusetts General Hospital), Andrew Nierenberg, William H Dow (0000-0002-4080-1668, University of California, Berkeley), Rita Hui, Rita L Hui (0000-0003-0014-2431, corresponding author), Robert G Frank (0000-0003-1551-7072, Harvard University), Richard Frank (0000-0001-5927-1217), Joseph P Newhouse (0000-0001-5837-3203, Harvard University), John Hsu (0000-0001-8244-231X, Mass General Brigham) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 614-621 |
| Publication date | 2013-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Medical Care (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948 |
| Publisher | Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31829019c5 |
| PMID | 23752219 |
| PMCID | PMC3687515 |
| OpenAlex | W2023521639 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 7 |
OBJECTIVE: Medicare Part D provides formulary protections for antipsychotics but does not exempt these drugs from cost-sharing. We investigated the impact of Part D coverage on antipsychotic drug spending, adherence, and clinical outcomes among beneficiaries with varying indications for use. METHODS: We conducted a historical cohort study of Medicare Advantage beneficiaries who received antipsychotic drugs, with diagnoses of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder or with no mental health diagnoses (N=10,190). Half had a coverage gap; half had no gap because of low-income subsidies. Using fixed effects regression models, we examined changes in spending and adherence as beneficiaries experienced cost-sharing increases after reaching the gap. We examined changes in hospitalizations and emergency department visits using proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Across all diagnostic groups, total monthly expenditure on antipsychotic drugs decreased with cost-sharing increases in the gap compared with those with no gap (eg, schizophrenia: -$123 95% confidence interval [-$138, -$108]), and out-of-pocket spending increased (eg, schizophrenia: $104 [$98, $110]). Adherence similarly decreased, with the largest declines among those with schizophrenia (-20.6 percentage points [-22.3, -18.9] in proportion of days covered). Among beneficiaries with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, hospitalizations and emergency department visit rates increased with cost-sharing increases (eg, schizophrenia: hazard ratio=1.32 [1.06, 1.65] for all hospitalizations), but did not among subjects without mental health diagnoses. Clinical event rates did not change among beneficiaries with low-income subsidies without gaps. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence of interruptions in antipsychotic use attributable to Part D cost-sharing. Adverse events increased among beneficiaries with approved indications for use, but not among beneficiaries without such indications
Antipsychotic · Bipolar disorder · Cognition · Confidence interval · Cost sharing · Emergency department · Family medicine · Formulary · Hazard ratio · Medical prescription · Medicare Part D · Mental health · Prescription drug · Psychiatry · Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming) · Emergency Medicine · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Internal Medicine · Medication Adherence and Compliance · Medicine · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,18 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2024 (10) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |