The role of discriminant analysis in the refinement of customer satisfaction assessment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9259632 |
|---|---|
| Authors | BD Verdessi (San Antonio Regional Health Service, Chile), G Jara (San Antonio Regional Health Service, Chile), R Fuentes (0000-0002-1917-5033, San Antonio Regional Health Service, Chile), JC Gonzalez (San Antonio Regional Health Service, Chile), F Espejo (San Antonio Regional Health Service, Chile), AC de Azevedo (World Health Organization, Chile) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 623-630 |
| Publication date | 2000-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revista de Saúde Pública (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-8910 • E-ISSN: 0034-8910 |
| Publisher | FapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1590/s0034-89102000000600010 |
| PMID | 11175608 |
| OpenAlex | W2095709511 |
| SCIELO_PID | S0034-89102000000600010 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 29 |
OBJECTIVE: To test discriminant analysis as a method of turning the information of a routine customer satisfaction survey (CSS) into a more accurate decision-making tool. METHODS: A 7-question, 10-multiple choice, self-applied questionnaire was used to study a sample of patients seen in two outpatient care units in Valparaíso, Chile, one of primary care (n=100) and the other of secondary care (n=249). Two cutting points were considered in the dependent variable (final satisfaction score): satisfied versus unsatisfied, and very satisfied versus all others. Results were compared with empirical measures (proportion of satisfied individuals, proportion of unsatisfied individuals and size of the median). RESULTS: The response rate was very high, over 97.0% in both units. A new variable, medical attention, was revealed, as explaining satisfaction at the primary care unit. The proportion of the total variability explained by the model was very high (over 99.4%) in both units, when comparing satisfied with unsatisfied customers. In the analysis of very satisfied versus all other customers, significant relationship was identified only in the case of the primary care unit, which explained a small proportion of the variability (41.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Discriminant analysis identified relationships not revealed by the previous analysis. It provided information about the proportion of the variability explained by the model. It identified non-significant relationships suggested by empirical analysis (e.g. the case of the relation very satisfied versus others in the secondary care unit). It measured the contribution of each independent variable to the explanation of the variation of the dependent one
Business · Customer satisfaction · Family medicine · Linear discriminant analysis · Multiple discriminant analysis · Patient satisfaction · Primary care · Sample (material) · Statistics · Test (biology) · Unit (ring theory) · Variable (mathematics) · Variables · Customer Service Quality and Loyalty · Healthcare Quality and Management · Marketing · Mathematics · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Psychology
Patient Evaluations of Hospital Care A Review of the Literature
Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Physicians Among Older and Diseased Adults in a Primary Care Municipal Outpatient Setting An Examination of Three Instruments
A Comparative Study of Seven Measures of Patient Satisfaction
The PJHQ Questionnaire Exploratory Factor Analysis and Empirical Scale Construction
Does Sponsorship Matter in Patient Satisfaction Surveys
The Measurement of Quality of Care in the Veterans Health Administration
Quality judgements by patients on general practice care
Patient satisfaction
A comparative study of patient satisfaction with health care in Japan and the United States
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |