Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Does the cue help? Children's understanding of multiplicative concepts in different problem contexts

Bibliographic Data

ID9614655
AuthorsSarah Squire (University of Oxford, corresponding author), Charlotte Davies (0000-0002-3468-4258, University of Oxford), Peter Bryant (0000-0002-5667-8633, University of Oxford)
Year2004
Volume74
Issue4
Pages515-532
Publication date2004-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Educational Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0998 • E-ISSN: 2044-8279
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1348/0007099042376364
PMID15530199
OpenAlexW1984650390
LanguageEN
Citations received2

Background: Understanding arithmetical principles is a key part of a conceptual understanding of mathematics. However, very little attention has been paid to children's understanding of multiplicative, as compared to additive, principles. Aims: This study investigated(a) children's ability to use commutative and distributive cues to solve multiplication problems, (b) whether their ability to use these cues depends on the problem context, and(c) whether separate mechanisms might underlie children's understanding of commutativity and distributivity. Sample: Twenty‐seven 9‐year‐olds (Year 5) and thirty‐two 10‐year‐olds (Year 6). Methods: Forty‐eight multiplication problems (with a multiple‐choice response format) were presented to children. There were four types of problem: Commutative, Distributive, Combined commutative‐distributive(all preceded by a cue) and No cue problems. Each type of problem was presented in three different contexts: Isomorphism of measures, Area, and Cartesian product. Results: Children demonstrated a good understanding of commutativity but a very poor understanding of distributivity. A common mistake in the distributive problems was to select the number that was one more, or one less, than the answer in the cue. Children's understanding of distributivity (but not commutativity) seemed to depend on the problem context. Factor analysis suggested that separate factors underlie the ability to solve commutative and distributive problems. Conclusions: Nine‐ and 10‐year‐olds understand commutativity, but are unable to use the distributive principle in multiplication. Their errors suggest that they may confuse some of the principles of multiplication with those of addition. When children do begin to understand the principle of distributivity, they most easily apply it in the context of Isomorphism of measures multiplication problems. The implications for mathematical education are discussed

Combinatorics · Commutative property · Context (archaeology) · Distributive property · Distributivity · Linguistics · Multiplication (music) · Multiplicative function · Pure mathematics · Reciprocal · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills · Education, Achievement, and Giftedness · Mathematics · Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • The development of arithmetic principle knowledge

    Open Access•Richard W Prather, Richard Prather et al.•Developmental Review•2009

  • Defining and measuring conceptual knowledge in mathematics

    Open Access•Noelle M Crooks, Martha W Alibali•Developmental Review•2014

Citations per year0.12
Citation span2009 - 2014 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae