Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Rasch measurement model analysis of the Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory

Bibliographic Data

ID9615255
AuthorsRussell F Waugh, Russell Waugh (Edith Cowan University, corresponding author), Patricia A Addison (Curtin University)
Year1998
Volume68
Issue1
Pages95-112
Publication date1998-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Educational Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-0998 • E-ISSN: 2044-8279
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01277.x
PMID9589625
OpenAlexW2089120060
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited12

Background . The Revised Approaches to Studying Inventory (Entwistle & Tait, 1994) comprises 38 self‐report items designed to measure student approaches to learning in a higher education context. The items have been conceptualised and designed from five learning orientations, corresponding to five subscales of the Inventory: ‘a deep approach’, ‘a surface approach’, ‘a strategic approach’, ‘a lack of direction’ and ‘academic self‐confidence’. Aims . The study aims to create an interval level scale for the Inventory and analyse its psychometric properties using a modern measurement model, the Extended Logistic Model of Rasch (Andrich, 1988a, 1988b; Rasch, 1980), and investigate the conceptual design of the Inventory. Sample . The sample was 346 students (170 females, 176 males, 212 less than 23 years and 134 older than 23), studying in first year Faculty of Business, at a university in Perth, Western Australia. Method . A scale was created for the Inventory and analysed for reliability, fit to the model, meaning and validity. The Inventory was analysed separately for each of four subgroups (females, males, younger and older students) to test the invariance of the scale. The five subscales were analysed separately to test the conceptual design and meaning of the Inventory. Results . The Inventory has satisfactory psychometric properties, when items 20 and 33 are deleted. Easier and harder items need to be added to better target the student measures. Its conceptual design from the five learning orientations is confirmed. Only 15 items have satisfactory invariance across the four subgroups. The psychometric properties of three subscales (deep approach, surface approach and strategic approach) are only moderately satisfactory and the item separabilities of the other two (lack of direction and academic self‐confidence) are unsatisfactory. Conclusions . The Extended Logistic Model of Rasch was found to be useful in creating an interval level scale for the Inventory, and for analysing its psychometric properties and conceptual design. It is suggested that the Inventory can be improved conceptually by adding more items relating to attitudes, intentions and behaviour and by adding harder and easier items to target the student measures better

Context (archaeology) · Developmental psychology · Meaning (existential) · Psychometrics · Psychotherapist · Rasch model · Reliability (semiconductor) · Sample (material) · Scale (ratio) · Test (biology) · Applied Psychology · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences · Psychology · Social Psychology · Student Assessment and Feedback

  • Cross-national Consistency in the Relationship Between Bullying Behaviors and Psychosocial Adjustment

    Tonja R Nansel, Wendy Craig et al.•Archives of Pediatrics and…•2004

  • Longitudinal modelling of academic buoyancy and motivation

    Open Access•Andrew J Martins, Susan H Colmar et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2010

  • Using Rasch Analysis to Validate the Revised PSQI to Assess Sleep Disorders in Taiwan’s Hi-tech Workers

    Open Access•Tsair‐Wei Chien, Tsair-Wei Chien et al.•Community Mental Health Journal•2008

  • Understanding Student Learning (Routledge Revivals)

    Noel Entwistle, Paul Ramsden•Understanding Student Learning…•2015

  • Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning Outcomes

    Open Access•John Biggs•Higher Education•1979

  • Gender differences in responses to the Approaches to Studying Inventory

    John T E Richardson•Studies in Higher Education•1993

  • A rating formulation for ordered response categories

    Open Access•David Andrich•Psychometrika•1978

  • Learning styles and approaches to learning

    Open Access•Rosalind Murray‐harvey•British Journal of Educational…•1994

  • On Qualitative Differences in Learning-ii Outcome as a Function of the Learner's Conception of the Task

    Open Access•Ference Marton, R Säaljö•British Journal of Educational…•1976

  • A Study of Two "Quick-and-easy" Methods of Assessing Individual Differences in Student Learning

    Open Access•Stephen E Newstead•British Journal of Educational…•1992

  • Interpretation of Factor Analyses From the Approaches to Studying Inventory

    Open Access•Greg Harper, G S Harper et al.•British Journal of Educational…•1989

  • The Role of Metalearning in Study Processes

    Open Access•J B Biggs, John Biggs•British Journal of Educational…•1985

  • Reliability and replicability of the Approaches to Studying Questionnaire

    John T E Richardson•Studies in Higher Education•1990

  • Mature students in higher education

    John T E Richardson•Studies in Higher Education•1994

  • Mature students in higher education

    John T E Richardson•Studies in Higher Education•1995

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0.14
Citation span2004 - 2010 (7)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae