Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Problem With “Proficiency”

Limitations of Statistics and Policy Under No Child Left Behind

Bibliographic Data

ID9735450
AuthorsAndrew Dean Ho (ANDREW DEAN HO is an assistant professor in Psychological and Quantitative Foundations at the University of Iowa, 316 Lindquist Center, Iowa City, IA 52242; . His research interests are in statistical methods and conceptual frameworks for validating test-score gains under high-stakes accountability systems), Andrew Ho (0000-0003-1287-9844, ACT Foundation, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume37
Issue6
Pages351-360
Publication date2008-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEducational Researcher (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-189X • E-ISSN: 1935-102X
PublisherAmerican Educational Research Association (AERA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3102/0013189x08323842
OpenAlexW2099441957
LanguageEN
Citations received26
References cited16

The Percentage of Proficient Students (PPS) has become a ubiquitous statistic under the No Child Left Behind Act. This focus on proficiency has statistical and substantive costs. The author demonstrates that the PPS metric offers only limited and unrepresentative depictions of large-scale test score trends, gaps, and gap trends. The limitations are unpredictable, dramatic, and difficult to correct in the absence of other data. Interpretation of these depictions generally leads to incorrect or incomplete inferences about distributional change. The author shows how the statistical shortcomings of these depictions extend to shortcomings of policy, from exclusively encouraging score gains near the proficiency cut score to shortsighted comparisons of state and national testing results. The author proposes alternatives for large-scale score reporting and argues that a distribution-wide perspective on results is required for any serious analysis of test score data, including “growth”-related results under the recent Growth Model Pilot Program

Accountability · Econometrics · Economics · Geography · Mathematics education · Metric (unit · No child left behind · Operations management · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Scale (ratio · Standardized test · Statistic · Statistical hypothesis testing · Statistics · Test (biology · Test score · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Law · Mathematics · Psychology · School Choice and Performance

  • Beyond the school building

    Open Access•Nandrea Burrell, Erica Harbatkin•Education Policy Analysis Archives•2024

  • The Implications of No Child Left Behind’s Waivers for Contemporary School Improvement Systems

    Open Access•Joshua Bleiberg•Educational Policy•2026

  • School District and Community Factors Associated with Test Score Declines During the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Erin M Fahle, Thomas J Kane et al.•Teachers College Record The Voice…•2025

  • Three Metrics for Monitoring Educational Progress when Tested Populations Change

    Open Access•Andrew Ho•Teachers College Record The Voice…•2025

  • Estimating Trends From Censored Assessment Data Under No Child Left Behind

    Open Access•Katherine E Furgol, Andrew D Ho et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2010

  • Leading Indicators of Academic Achievement

    Open Access•Lindsey Devers Basileo, Merewyn Elizabeth Lyons et al.•SAGE Open•2024

  • Educational Opportunity in Early and Middle Childhood

    Open Access•Sean F Reardon•RSF The Russell Sage Foundation…•2019

  • Measuring success

    Open Access•Anthony Pace, Rebecca M Alper et al.•Early Childhood Research Quarterly•2018

  • Accountability-driven school reform

    Open Access•Gary T Henry, Shelby M Mcneill et al.•Early Childhood Research Quarterly•2022

  • Accountability, Test Prep Incentives, and the Design of Math and English Exams

    Open Access•Evan Riehl, Meredith Welch•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2022

  • Evaluating Education Governance

    Open Access•Beth E Schueler, Joshua Bleiberg et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2021

  • Common Purposes

    Nikolaus J Barkauskas•American Journal of Education•2022

  • The politics of teachers' union endorsements

    Open Access•Michael T Hartney, Vladimir Kogan•American Journal of Political…•2025

  • An Urban District’s Struggle to Preserve School Turnaround Change

    Open Access•Coby V Meyers•Urban Education•2024

  • Accountability as a Design for Teacher Learning

    Open Access•Ilana Seidel Horn•Urban Education•2018

  • Practices and Commitments of Test-centric Literacy Instruction

    Open Access•Dennis S Davis, Angeli Willson et al.•Reading Research Quarterly•2015

  • The Waive of the Future? School Accountability in the Waiver Era

    Open Access•Morgan S Polikoff, Andrew Mceachin et al.•Educational Researcher•2014

  • Teaching to the Test” in the NCLB Era

    Open Access•Jennifer L Jennings, Jonathan Bearak et al.•Educational Researcher•2014

  • Fully Accounting for English Learner Performance

    Open Access•Megan Hopkins, Karen D Thompson et al.•Educational Researcher•2013

  • We Are the 5

    Open Access•Andrew Mceachin, Morgan S Polikoff•Educational Researcher•2012

  • Accountability Policy, School Organization, and Classroom Practice

    Open Access•J B Diamond•Education and Urban Society•2012

  • Uneven Progress

    Open Access•Kaylee T Matheny, Marissa E Thompson et al.•American Educational Research…•2023

  • Centralization and Long-Term System Performance

    Open Access•Beth E Schueler•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • High-Stakes Accountability in Social and Political Context

    Open Access•Argun Saatcioglu, Thomas M Skrtic et al.•Sociological Inquiry•2021

  • Neoliberal Education Reform and the Perpetuation of Inequality

    Open Access•Jessica Brathwaite•Critical Sociology•2017

  • The Geography of Racial/Ethnic Test Score Gaps

    Sean F Reardon, Demetra Kalogrides et al.•American Journal of Sociology•2019

  • Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking

    Open Access•Michael J Kolen, Robert L Brennan•Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking•2004

  • Left Behind by Design

    Derek Neal, Diane Whitmore Schanzenbach•The Review of Economics and…•2010

  • Accountability Systems

    Open Access•Robert L Linn, Eva L Baker et al.•Educational Researcher•2002

  • Gauging Growth

    Open Access•Bruce Fuller, Joseph Wright et al.•Educational Researcher•2007

  • Below the Bubble

    Open Access•Jennifer Booher-Jennings, Jennifer Booher‐Jennings•American Educational Research…•2005

Unique citing works26
Citations per year1,63
Citation span2010 - 2026 (17)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 26

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae