Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Economic Direction and Generational Change in Twentieth-Century Britain

The Case of the Scottish Coalfields

Bibliographic Data

ID9737270
AuthorsJim Phillips (0000-0002-5183-9469, University of Glasgow, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume132
Issue557
Pages885-911
Publication date2017-11-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe English Historical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0013-8266 • E-ISSN: 1477-4534
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ehr/cex199
OpenAlexW2741807799
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited3

Changes in economic direction in Britain in the twentieth century were incremental, rarely permanent, and strongly contested, although trends to deindustrialisation, widened inequality and the ostracism of trade unions from policy-making were clear by the mid-1980s. This followed the defeat of the striking miners in 1984–5, a decisive movement in macro-economic direction. This case study of the Scottish coalfields uses generational analysis to illuminate the contested nature of these long-running economic changes. Three distinct trade union generations are identified, each of which was linked to successive ideal-types of economic unit. Each type represented an ever-larger economy of scale and qualitative changes in coalfield employment: ‘Village Pits’, ‘New Mines’, and ‘Cosmopolitan Collieries’. The evolving organisation of production, combined with other powerful experiences in early adulthood, gave rise to different political goals for each successive generation. The first, born in the 1890s, won the primary objective of nationalisation in 1947; the second, born in the 1920s, secured important changes to the manner in which the nationalised industry operated in the 1960s, gaining greater control for the workforce and enhanced economic security for the wider community; the third, born in the 1950s, attempted to defend the social democratic elements of the nationalised order in the 1980s against changing macro-economic strategy and micro-managerial operations which threatened pits, jobs and the voice of the worker in decision-making. Nationalisation, it is shown, was a success from the perspective of the workforce, but only because trade unions compelled the National Coal Board and the UK government to preserve economic security in the coalfields. These victories of the 1960s were overturned, however, by the Conservative government in the 1980s, at enormous cost to coalfield communities and workers

Economic growth · Economics · Economy · Labour economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Trade union · Workforce · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US

  • Neighbourhood Change, Deprivation, Peripherality, and Ageing in the Yorkshire Coalfield

    Open Access•Andrew Wallace•Social Inclusion•2024

  • Mass-Observation, Left Intellectuals and the Politics of Everyday Life

    Open Access•Alexandre Campsie•The English Historical Review•2016

  • The Miners' Strike

    Martin Adeney, John Lloyd•Labour / Le Travail•1988

  • The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century

    Edward P Thompson•Past & Present•1971

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae