Évaluation de la performance dans les tribunaux administratifs
Synthèse critique de la littérature et agenda de recherche
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 9783107 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mah Aristide Dion (0009-0000-2791-5364, Doctorant en science politique Université Laval, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 69 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 110-126 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-4840 • E-ISSN: 1754-7121 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/capa.70051 |
| OpenAlex | W7134938399 |
| Language | FR |
| References cited | 62 |
Sommaire À première vue, l'évaluation de la performance s'accommode difficilement avec les principes de fonctionnement des institutions investies d'une fonction juridictionnelle. C'est pourquoi une littérature émergente, mais fragmentée, s'intéresse à son adoption dans les tribunaux administratifs. Le présent article synthétise cette littérature à l'aune de la littérature critique sur l'évaluation de la performance. Il montre que l'évaluation de la performance influence les tribunaux administratifs au profit de priorités politiques, remettant ainsi en cause leur spécificité institutionnelle. Il propose également un agenda de recherche
Context (archaeology · Duty · Perspective (graphical · Profit (economics · Healthcare Systems and Practices · Legal Systems and Institutions · Public Policy and Administration Research
Unjust by Design
Regulation Inside Government
The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector
On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector
Literature reviews as independent studies
Reconceptualizing Administrative Burden Around Onerous Experiences
From New Public Management to New Political Governance
Gender budgeting in public financial management
The immigrant versus the state
The politics and consequences of performance measurement
Institutionnalisation de l'évaluation et nouvelle gestion publique
Congressional Constraint? The Review of In Absentia Immigration Removal Orders in Federal Circuit Courts
Administrative Burden in Citizen–State Interactions
Evaluators and the enhanced Commonwealth performance framework
Mapping current issues in administrative justice
The grammar of administrative justice values
La qualité des décisions de justice. Quels critères
Does performance measurement improve public sector performance? A case of Australian government agencies
Performance Evaluation of Federal Administrative Law Judges
Protecting Agency Judges in an Age of Politicization
La mission permanente d’inspection de la justice administrative
Qualité de la justice administrative et contentieux des étrangers
Qualité et évaluation des magistrats de l’ordre administratif
Les notions de qualité et de performance de la justice administrative
La qualité de la justice administrative
Gestion des dossiers et qualite de la justice administrative
Independence in Administrative Adjudications
The Effect of Administrative Burden on Bureaucratic Perception of Policies
What’s Measured Is What Matters
Exploring performance paradox in public organizations
Delivering Results for Canadians
L’adoption et le suivi de la performance d’une mesure interministérielle
Navigating the challenges of policy evaluation
Internal governmental performance and accountability in Canada
Tribunals and guidelines
Administrative Burden Revisited
Goal Ambiguity and Organizational Performance in U.S. Federal Agencies
Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures
Types of administrative burden reduction strategies
Administrative Burden
A Conceptual Framework for Analysis of Goal Ambiguity in Public Organizations
Power and Public Administration
La gestion par résultats au sein du tribunal administratif du travail
A Public Management for All Seasons
How the Trump Administration's Quota Policy Transformed Immigration Judging
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |