Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Enabling organizational ambidexterity

Valuation practices and the senior-leadership team

Bibliographic Data

ID9890036
AuthorsEric Knight (0000-0002-2216-0131, University of Sydney Business School, Australia,, corresponding author), Suresh Cuganesan (0000-0002-9574-5499, The University of Sydney, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume73
Issue2
Pages190-214
Publication date2020-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Relations (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-7267 • E-ISSN: 1741-282X
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0018726718823247
OpenAlexW2921360120
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited50

Are design solutions sufficient to strategically manage the tensions key to long-term organizational survival? Managing the competing demands of exploration and exploitation represent a fundamental challenge for senior-leadership teams, but a growing body of research suggests that accommodating the mere co-presence of exploration and exploitation in separated units is not enough. Senior-leadership teams must also integrate and mobilize activities across units to achieve synergistic benefits; however, doing so is fraught with difficulty. We investigate and unpack this conundrum based on an in-depth ethnographic case within a media organization as the senior-leadership team transitioned toward greater synergistic integration of explore/exploit activities across differentiated units. We contribute to ambidexterity research by contrasting the dominant view of resolving tension in prior research with the view of valuing tension in our findings, and revealing the important role that senior-leadership team practices play in this regard. Furthermore, we show that the valuation practices of the senior-leadership team enable constructive divergence to be surfaced amongst the team, thereby extending prior work that has concentrated on the unifying aspects of the senior-leadership team to enable synergistic benefits

Ambidexterity · Business · Constructive · Economics · Exploit · Knowledge management · Leadership style · Management · Neuroleadership · Political science · Process (computing · Public relations · Senior management · Shared leadership · Valuation (finance · Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence · Computer Science · Innovation and Knowledge Management · Psychology · Team Dynamics and Performance

  • Cultivating Ambidexterity Through a Paradox Pedagogy

    Open Access•Gaia Grant, Martin Dowson•Journal of Management Education•2026

  • Excellence through learning

    Ansgar Zerfaß, Caroline Siegel et al.•Journal of Communication Management•2026

  • Politics of social value in the built environment

    Open Access•Mustafa Selçuk Çıdık•Buildings and Cities•2023

  • Knowyourworth

    Open Access•Hannah Trittin-Ulbrich, Sarah Glozer•Human Relations•2024

  • Hacking work

    Open Access•Peter Bloom, Martyna Śliwa•Human Relations•2022

  • Presenting as a chief strategy officer

    Open Access•Eric Knight, Paula Jarzabkowski•Human Relations•2023

  • Toward a Theory of Paradox

    Wilson K Smith, Wendy K Smith et al.•Academy of Management Review•2011

  • Organizational Ambidexterity

    Charles A O’reilly, Charles A O'Reilly et al.•Academy of Management Perspectives•2013

  • Strategy-as-Practice

    Eero Vaara, Richard Whittington•Academy of Management Annals•2012

  • What Happens When Evaluation Goes Online? Exploring Apparatuses of Valuation in the Travel Sector

    Wanda J Orlikowski, Scott et al.•Organization Science•2014

  • Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability

    Open Access•Charles A O’reilly, Michael L Tushman•Research in Organizational Behavior•2008

  • Dynamic Decision Making

    Wilson K Smith, Wendy K Smith•Academy of Management Journal•2014

  • Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity

    Constantine Andriopoulos, M W Lewis•Organization Science•2009

  • Organizational Ambidexterity

    Sebastian Raisch, Julian Birkinshaw et al.•Organization Science•2009

  • Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process

    Raymond E Miles, Charles C Snow et al.•Academy of Management Review•1978

  • Values Work

    J Gehman, Linda Klebe Trevino et al.•Academy of Management Journal•2013

  • Exploration vs. Exploitation

    Zi‐Lin He, Zi-Lin He et al.•Organization Science•2004

  • Managing Strategic Contradictions

    Wilson K Smith, Wendy K Smith et al.•Organization Science•2005

  • Organizational Ambidexterity

    Open Access•Sebastian Raisch, Julian Birkinshaw•Journal of Management•2008

  • Persuasion With Case Studies

    Nicolaj Siggelkow•Academy of Management Journal•2007

  • Case Study Research

    Harris Chaiklin•The Journal of Nervous and Mental…•1991

  • Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning

    James G March•Organization Science•1991

  • The Site of the Social

    Theodore R Schatzki•The Site of the Social•2002

  • In TripAdvisor we trust

    Open Access•Ingrid Jeacle, Chris Carter•Accounting, Organizations and…•2011

  • In pursuit of ambidexterity

    Open Access•Angeliki Papachroni, Loizos Heracleous et al.•Human Relations•2016

  • Naturalistic inquiry

    Open Access•Yvonna S Lincoln, Egon G Guba et al.•International Journal of…•1985

Citations per year1.5
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae