Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Michael Ruse

Biographic Data

ID119143
NAMEMichael Ruse
GIVEN NAMESMichael
FAMILY NAMERuse
SIGNATURERUSE M
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Guelph
ORCID0000-0001-5740-0169
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS131
TOTAL CITATIONS121
AUTHOR COUNT122
EDITOR COUNT9
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1969
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX6
  • Darwin Mythology: Debunking Myths, Correcting Falsehoods

    J L Heilbron, Pietro Corsi et al.•BOOK•Darwin Mythology•2024

  • Practicing Atheism: Culture, Media, and Ritual in the Contemporary Atheist Network

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•The Journal of Religion•2023

  • Evolution and ethics viewed from within two metaphors: Machine and organism

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•History & Philosophy of the Life…•2022•References: 1

  • Why We Hate: Understanding the Roots of Human Conflict

    Michael Ruse•BOOK•Why We Hate•2022

  • Taking God Seriously: Two Different Voices

    Open Access•Brian Davies, Michael Ruse•BOOK•Taking God Seriously•2021

    Is debate on issues related to faith and reason still possible when dialogue between believers and non-believers has collapsed? Taking God Seriously not only proves that it is possible, but also demonstrates that such dialogue produces fruitful results. Here, Brian Davies, a Dominican priest and leading scholar of Thomas Aquinas, and Michael Ruse, a philosopher of science and well-known non-believer, offer an extended discussion on the nature and…

  • The Cambridge History of Atheism

    Open Access•Michael Ruse, Stephen Bullivant•BOOK•Cambridge History of Atheism•2021

    The two-volume Cambridge History of Atheism offers an authoritative and up to date account of a subject of contemporary interest. Comprised of sixty essays by an international team of scholars, this History is comprehensive in scope. The essays are written from a variety of disciplinary perspectives, including religious studies, philosophy, sociology, and classics. Offering a global overview of the subject, from antiquity to the present, the volu…

  • Cambridge History of Atheism

    Michael Ruse, Stephen Bullivant•BOOK•Cambridge History of Atheism•2021

  • Taking God Seriously

    Brian Davies, Michael Ruse•BOOK•Taking God Seriously•2021

  • Come fu che un quacchero perse Dio e trovò Darwin

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•SOCIETÀ DEGLI INDIVIDUI (LA•2021

  • Confessions of an Agnostic: Apologia Pro Vita Sua

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Sophia•2021

  • Philosophy after Darwin: Classic and Contemporary Readings

    Larry Arnhart, Friedrich Von Bernhardi et al.•BOOK•Philosophy after Darwin•2021

  • Robert C. Bishop, Larry L. Funck, Raymond J. Lewis, Stephen O. Moshier, and John H. Walton, Understanding Scientilc Theories of Origins: Cosmology, Geology, and Biology in Christian Perspective

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Journal for the Study of Religion…•2021

    Robert C. Bishop, Larry L. Funck, Raymond J. Lewis, Stephen O. Moshier, and John H. Walton, Understanding Scientilc Theories of Origins: Cosmology, Geology, and Biology in Christian Perspective (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2018), xxiv + 659pp., $75.00 (hbk), ISBN: 978-0-8308-5291-8

  • Christianity and Darwinism: The Journey Is More Important Than the Destination

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Religions•2021•References: 19

    Does God exist? If he does, what is the evidence for this? Can one arrive at God through reason (natural theology), or is it faith or nothing (revealed theology)? I write of my lifetime of wrestling with this question. Raised a Quaker, I lost my faith at the age of 20. As an academic, I became an expert on Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution through natural selection. How can I make sense of-and how can I reconcile-these two hugely importa…

  • Building blocks of morality

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•HTS Teologiese Studies /…•2020

    Most of us agree about the rules or norms of morality, what philosophers call substantive or normative ethics: be kind to small children, do not cheat on exams and return your library books on time. The big disputes come over foundations, metaethics. This article considers the four main positions. Firstly, religious ethics : Here you appeal to the will of God. The problem is not everyone believes in God, and could God make it okay to mark up libr…

  • Can Christians Live with Extinction, or Will They Get Wiped Out?

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Philosophy Theology and the…•2019

    It took a long time to convince people of the reality of extinction, especially since it seemed to imply that God created organisms and then just let them die out – even worse, created organisms and let them die out before humans appeared. But it did happen and today people of religion accept this. What about humans? Are we going to go extinct? Are we going to be wiped out, for instance by global warming? Or are we all going to change into new be…

  • On Purpose

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•BOOK•On Purpose•2019

    Can we live without the idea of purpose? Should we even try to? Kant thought we were stuck with it, and even Darwin, who profoundly shook the idea, was unable to kill it. Indeed, purpose seems to be making a comeback today, as both religious advocates of intelligent design and some prominent secular philosophers argue that any explanation of life without the idea of purpose is missing something essential. This book explores the history of purpose…

  • Charles Darwin

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•CHAPTER•Encyclopedia of Evolutionary…•2019

  • After Darwin: Morality in a Secular World

    Jeff O’Connell, J E A O'Connell et al.•ARTICLE•Secular Studies•2019

    In the second half of the nineteenth century, many people lost their faith in the Christian God. Nevertheless, they were eager to show that this move towards a secular world picture did not mean the end of morality and that it could continue as much before. In a Darwinian age this was not possible and the Christian cherishing of the virtue of meekness was replaced by a moral respect for vigor and effort directed both towards self-realization and …

  • The Problem of War

    Michael Ruse•BOOK•Problem of War•2018

    Darwinian evolutionary theory is one of the brightest jewels in the crown of science; yet it has been highly controversial since its first appearance in the Origin of Species in 1859. Well known is the opposition of so many Christians, an opposition that shows little sign of abating today. The Problem of War: Darwinism, Christianity, and Their Battle to Understand Human Conflict argues that the roots of the unease lie not simply (as many think) i…

  • Rival Paradigms

    Michael Ruse•BOOK•Problem of War•2018

    We have two recent writers on war, one a Christian and the other a Darwinian, showing that the familiar themes continue strong. In In Defence of War , Oxford Regius Professor of Theology, Nigel Biggar, argues that an Augustinian position rightly acknowledges original sin and the need for Christians to take up arms. He thinks the slaughter on the Somme justified and endorses the propriety of the Second Iraq War. In The Better Angels of our Nature …

  • Christianity, Darwinism, and War: A Paradox

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Soundings An Interdisciplinary…•2018

    Both Christians and Darwinians have discussed the topic of war very extensively. There is a paradox. One might think that Christians, as followers of Jesus' commands in the Sermon on the Mount, would be against war, and Darwinians, as followers of the claims of the Origin of Species about a struggle for existence leading to change, would be in favor of war. To the contrary, Christians have long argued that one can legitimately go to war and that …

  • Problem of War: Darwinism, Christianity, and Their Battle to Understand Human Conflict

    Michael Ruse•BOOK•Problem of War•2018

    Darwinism and war: science or religion? argues that the different perspectives of Christians and Darwinians on the nature and causes of warfare reveal them to be playing the same game, offering not so much scientific or empirical explanations but rival value-laden analyses, suggesting we have less a science-religion conflict and more one between two rival religious visions - Christianity and a form of secular Darwinian humanism

  • The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Ethics

    Open Access•Hallvard Lillehammer, Jeffrey O’connell et al.•BOOK•Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary…•2017

    Evolutionary ethics - the application of evolutionary ideas to moral thinking and justification - began in the nineteenth century with the work of Charles Darwin and Herbert Spencer, but was subsequently criticized as an example of the naturalistic fallacy. In recent decades, however, evolutionary ethics has found new support among both the Darwinian and the Spencerian traditions. This accessible volume looks at the history of thought about evolu…

  • Love and Evolution

    Michael Ruse•CHAPTER•Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy…•2017

    Evolution today means Darwinian evolution, and that means natural selection. Can natural selection tell us anything about love? Sex and love are intertwined. They are not the same, but the former can give insights to the latter. Natural selection can tell us a great deal about sex. Why we have sex, why we have only two sexes, why some people have same-sex orientation. Can natural selection give us insights into the nature of love? Much depends on…

  • On Purpose

    Michael Ruse•BOOK•On Purpose•2017

Next
  • Darwin's debt to philosophy: An examination of the influence of the philosophical ideas of John F.W. Herschel and William Whewell on the development of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1975•Cited by: 29•References: 11

  • Biological Species: Natural Kinds, Individuals, or What

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1987•Cited by: 14•References: 36

  • Incest Avoidance as a Function of Environment and Heredity [and Comments and Reply]

    Ray H Bixler, Stuart A Altmann et al.•ARTICLE•Current Anthropology•1981•Cited by: 10•References: 11

    Although it has repeatedly been demonstrated that behavior is best understood as a function of the interrelatedness of nature and nurture, many social scientists persist in posing these determinants adversatively and then contend that genes and biology are, at best, minor determinants of behavior. Analysis in incest avoidance illustrates the inadequacy of efforts to reduce to irrelevance genetic determinants. Man and many other species exhibit st…

  • Response to the Commentary: Pro Judice

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1982•Cited by: 9

    1. How does Ruse's second remark, that saying is not the same as saying religion, fit into the overall story? Why is the difference between a negative argument (creation-science is not science) and a positive argument (creationscience is religion) important here? 2. Why does Ruse think that Laudan's strategy is inadequate? (remark three) 3. What are the three questions that Ruse feels must be addressed? (Hint: Did you read my overview? These ques…

  • Are There Gay Genes: Sociobiology and Homosexuality

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Journal of Homosexuality•1981•Cited by: 8

    This paper considers recent hypotheses prepared by sociobiologists purportedly giving Darwinian evolutionary explanations of human homosexuality. Four models are considered: balanced superior heterozygote fitness, kin selection, parental manipulation, and homosexuality as a maladaptive side effect of intensive natural selection for superior male heterosexual behavior. The evidence for the models is reviewed, and their philosophical adequacy is co…

  • Natural selection in The Origin of Species

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1971•Cited by: 7•References: 5

  • Definitions of Species in Biology

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1969•Cited by: 6•References: 7

  • Darwinism and mechanism: Metaphor in science

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2005•Cited by: 5•References: 2

  • Karl Popper's Philosophy of Biology

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1977•Cited by: 5•References: 13

    In recent years Sir Karl Popper has been turning his attention more and more towards philosophical problems arising from biology, particularly evolutionary biology. Popper suggests that perhaps neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory is better categorized as a metaphysical research program than as a scientific theory. In this paper it is argued that Popper can draw his conclusions only because he is abysmally ignorant of the current status of biologica…

  • The Relationship between Science and Religion in Britain, 1830-1870

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Church History•1975•Cited by: 5•References: 10

    It is almost a truism that when Charles Darwin'sOrigin of Speciesfirst appeared, in 1859, many people found its evolutionism to be unacceptable for religious reasons. They thought the theory of natural selection working by random variations conflicted with long-held and cherished beliefs about God and His relationship with man and the world. But although the general fact of the religious opposition to Darwinism is well-known, precise questions ab…

  • The Value of Analogical Models in Science

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Dialogue•1973•Cited by: 5•References: 3

    No one denies that scientists frequently use bodies of knowledge from already-explored fields of inquiry as models as they argue analogically in the attempt to build new theories in other fields; however, there appears to be considerable controversy about the values of the analogical models when once the new theories are complete. One school of thought has it that although acquaintance with a theory's analogical models might serve a useful pedago…

  • Teleology: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2000•Cited by: 4•References: 4

  • Charles Darwin and Artificial Selection

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Journal of the History of Ideas•1975•Cited by: 4

  • Commentary: The Academic as Expert Witness

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Science Technology & Human Values•1986•Cited by: 2

    Among the expert witnesses called by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) in 1981, in its successful attack on the Arkansas Creationism law, was a historian and philosopher of science, namely, me. As I have explained elsewhere, my task was to bridge the gap between the theological witnesses and the scientists.' In particular, I had to show, first, that the history of evolutionary theory is not a simplistic story of dogmatic atheistic science…

  • Charles Lyell and the Philosophers of Science

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1976•Cited by: 2•References: 5

    Two of the most influential evaluations of Charles Lyell's geological ideas were those of the philosophers of science, John F. W. Herschel and William Whewell. In this paper I shall argue that the great difference between these evaluations—whereas Herschel was fundamentally sympathetic to Lyell's geologizing, Whewell was fundamentally opposed—is a function of the fact that Herschel was an empiricist and Whewell a rationalist. For convenience, I s…

  • Essay Review: The Darwin Industry — A Critical Evalution: The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, Charles Darwin: The Years of Controversy, Wallace and Natural Selection

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•History of Science•1974•Cited by: 2

  • The Nature of Scientific Models: Formal v Material Analogy

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•1973•Cited by: 2•References: 6

  • Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•REVIEW•Endeavour•1999•Cited by: 1

  • The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. Roy Bhaskar

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Isis•1981•Cited by: 1

  • Definitions of Species in Biology

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1969•Cited by: 6•References: 7

  • The Revolution in Biology

    Open Access•Michael Ruse, Michael E Ruse•ARTICLE•Theoria•1970

  • Functional Statements in Biology

    Open Access•Michael Ruse, Michael E Ruse•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1971

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • The Species Problem: A Reply to Hull

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1971•References: 1

  • Natural selection in The Origin of Species

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1971•Cited by: 7•References: 5

  • Bunge on Time

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1972•References: 1

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Biological Adaptation

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1972•References: 3

    In successive issues of this journal Ronald Munson [2] and I [4] have made, quite independently, conflicting claims about the relationship between biological adaptation and biological function. I state, admittedly without proof, that “a functional statement in biology draws attention to the fact that what is under consideration is an adaptation or something which confers an ‘adaptive advantage’ on its possessor” ([4], p. 89). This was an identity…

  • A Reply to Wright's Analysis of Functional Statements

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1973

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • The Nature of Scientific Models: Formal v Material Analogy

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•1973•Cited by: 2•References: 6

  • The Value of Analogical Models in Science

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Dialogue•1973•Cited by: 5•References: 3

    No one denies that scientists frequently use bodies of knowledge from already-explored fields of inquiry as models as they argue analogically in the attempt to build new theories in other fields; however, there appears to be considerable controversy about the values of the analogical models when once the new theories are complete. One school of thought has it that although acquaintance with a theory's analogical models might serve a useful pedago…

  • Essay Review: The Darwin Industry — A Critical Evalution: The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, Charles Darwin: The Years of Controversy, Wallace and Natural Selection

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•History of Science•1974•Cited by: 2

  • Darwin's debt to philosophy: An examination of the influence of the philosophical ideas of John F.W. Herschel and William Whewell on the development of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1975•Cited by: 29•References: 11

  • Charles Darwin and Artificial Selection

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Journal of the History of Ideas•1975•Cited by: 4

  • Philosophy of Biological Science. David Hull

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Isis•1975

  • The Relationship between Science and Religion in Britain, 1830-1870

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Church History•1975•Cited by: 5•References: 10

    It is almost a truism that when Charles Darwin'sOrigin of Speciesfirst appeared, in 1859, many people found its evolutionism to be unacceptable for religious reasons. They thought the theory of natural selection working by random variations conflicted with long-held and cherished beliefs about God and His relationship with man and the world. But although the general fact of the religious opposition to Darwinism is well-known, precise questions ab…

  • Charles Lyell and the Philosophers of Science

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•The British Journal for the…•1976•Cited by: 2•References: 5

    Two of the most influential evaluations of Charles Lyell's geological ideas were those of the philosophers of science, John F. W. Herschel and William Whewell. In this paper I shall argue that the great difference between these evaluations—whereas Herschel was fundamentally sympathetic to Lyell's geologizing, Whewell was fundamentally opposed—is a function of the fact that Herschel was an empiricist and Whewell a rationalist. For convenience, I s…

  • Studies in the Philosophy of Biology. Reduction and Related Problems . Franciso José Ayala , Theodosius Dobzhansky

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Isis•1976

  • Darwin on Man: A Psychological Study of Scientific Creativity

    Michael Ruse, Howard E Gruber et al.•ARTICLE•The Journal of Interdisciplinary…•1976

  • Karl Popper's Philosophy of Biology

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1977•Cited by: 5•References: 13

    In recent years Sir Karl Popper has been turning his attention more and more towards philosophical problems arising from biology, particularly evolutionary biology. Popper suggests that perhaps neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory is better categorized as a metaphysical research program than as a scientific theory. In this paper it is argued that Popper can draw his conclusions only because he is abysmally ignorant of the current status of biologica…

  • Darwin and Herschel

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Studies in History and Philosophy…•1978•References: 15

  • Edward Manier. (1978), The young Darwin and his cultural circle . Dordrecht: Reidel, Reidel

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Philosophy of Science•1979

    An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content

  • Sociobiology and the Social Sciences

    Michael Ruse•CHAPTER•Sociobiology•1979

  • On Human Nature

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Psychosomatic Medicine•1979

  • Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense

    Open Access•Michael Ruse•BOOK•Sociobiology•1979

  • Sociobiology and Behavior

    Michael Ruse•ARTICLE•Environmental Ethics•1979

Philosophy (95 works) · Epistemology (82 works) · Computer Science (53 works) · Sociology (47 works) · Evolution and Science Education (45 works) · Darwinism (34 works) · History (33 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (32 works) · Philosophy (26 works) · Psychology (26 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae