Claudio Cormick
Biographic Data
| ID | 4994996 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Claudio Cormick |
| GIVEN NAMES | Claudio |
| FAMILY NAME | Cormick |
| SIGNATURE | CORMICK C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0162-2429 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 10 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 10 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
«Confiabilismo evolucionista» y «positivismo fenomenológico»
En el presente trabajo, intentaremos exponer la oposición entre dos acercamientos al problema de la confiabilidad global de las capacidades cognitivas humanas, y una posible solución a tal conflicto. Por un lado, como señalaremos, existe un número de acercamientos que caen bajo el amplio nombre de “confiabilismo evolucionista” y de acuerdo con los cuales las razones de las que disponemos para creer en la confiabilidad de la cognición humana son d…
Violations of Argumentation Standards in Contemporary Debates on Health and Reproductive Rights
This article presents an exercise in prebunking, a preventive strategy based on inoculation theory (McGuire, 1964), aimed at enhancing cognitive resistance to misinformation. The analysis examines a set of arguments articulated from prejudicial and false information circulating in the debate on the inclusion of trans people in the field of reproductive health and rights. Through an assessment of their underlying premises, logical coherence, and e…
Attacking a Straw Man? A theoretical alternative and an exploratory empirical approach on how to “inoculate” students against astrology
Who Says Scientific Laws Are Not Explanatory
Constructivism or Epistemic Advantage, But Not Both
Can we maintain that all knowledge is relative to specific frameworks (such as socially situated standpoints) while also claiming that some frameworks are better than others? This tension risks either circularity—privileging a standpoint by its own standards—or inconsistency, by invoking a non-situated vantage point. Ashton and McKenna propose a solution: some achievements, though rooted in one standpoint, can be evaluated using criteria shared a…
Anti-Intellectualism?” Situating Javier Milei’s Discourse About Science
Usos de los juicios de valor en la ciencia
El argumento de la subdeterminación establece que las personas de ciencia pueden utilizar valores políticos para orientar la investigación, pero no proporciona criterios para distinguir entre una orientación legítima y una ilegítima. Este artículo provee tales criterios. El análisis de los confusos argumentos contra la ciencia cargada de valores revela el criterio fundamental de la orientación ilegítima: cuando los juicios de valor operan orienta…
L’internalisme et l’universalisme de Merleau-Ponty
According to Merleau-Ponty, psychologism, sociologism, and historicism, all of which describe human consciousness as “conditioned”, would be incompatible with any claim to knowledge. However, the reason why knowledge would require a postulate of the autonomy of consciousness remains little explored in the specialized literature. Therefore, in our work we try to separate different aspects of the skeptical problem analyzed by Merleau-Ponty and show…
La epistemología naturalizada
The article presents a brief reconstruction of naturalized epistemology, understood as a methodological approach. Three emblematic positions within naturalized epistemology are distinguished: rejection of apriorism inepistemology, favoring the use of the results of empirical science; attribution of an instrumental normativity to epistemology; and the thesis of the empirical assessability of the epistemic norms or principles. The text addresses th…
Tiempo y situacionalidad. La “respuesta” merleaupontiana a la paradoja de McTaggart
Se busca establecer una relacion no satisfactoriamente explorada entre lafenomenologia merleaupontiana del tiempo y un problema central de la theory of time analitica la paradoja de McTaggart Al clarifcar en polemica con Priest 1998 el autentico sentido del subjetivismo merleaupontiano con respecto al tiempo se senala como establecer una confuencia entre el acercamiento fenomenologico y las tesis desarrolladas por Michael Dummett como respuesta a…
Violations of Argumentation Standards in Contemporary Debates on Health and Reproductive Rights
This article presents an exercise in prebunking, a preventive strategy based on inoculation theory (McGuire, 1964), aimed at enhancing cognitive resistance to misinformation. The analysis examines a set of arguments articulated from prejudicial and false information circulating in the debate on the inclusion of trans people in the field of reproductive health and rights. Through an assessment of their underlying premises, logical coherence, and e…
Tiempo y situacionalidad. La “respuesta” merleaupontiana a la paradoja de McTaggart
Se busca establecer una relacion no satisfactoriamente explorada entre lafenomenologia merleaupontiana del tiempo y un problema central de la theory of time analitica la paradoja de McTaggart Al clarifcar en polemica con Priest 1998 el autentico sentido del subjetivismo merleaupontiano con respecto al tiempo se senala como establecer una confuencia entre el acercamiento fenomenologico y las tesis desarrolladas por Michael Dummett como respuesta a…
L’internalisme et l’universalisme de Merleau-Ponty
According to Merleau-Ponty, psychologism, sociologism, and historicism, all of which describe human consciousness as “conditioned”, would be incompatible with any claim to knowledge. However, the reason why knowledge would require a postulate of the autonomy of consciousness remains little explored in the specialized literature. Therefore, in our work we try to separate different aspects of the skeptical problem analyzed by Merleau-Ponty and show…
La epistemología naturalizada
The article presents a brief reconstruction of naturalized epistemology, understood as a methodological approach. Three emblematic positions within naturalized epistemology are distinguished: rejection of apriorism inepistemology, favoring the use of the results of empirical science; attribution of an instrumental normativity to epistemology; and the thesis of the empirical assessability of the epistemic norms or principles. The text addresses th…
Usos de los juicios de valor en la ciencia
El argumento de la subdeterminación establece que las personas de ciencia pueden utilizar valores políticos para orientar la investigación, pero no proporciona criterios para distinguir entre una orientación legítima y una ilegítima. Este artículo provee tales criterios. El análisis de los confusos argumentos contra la ciencia cargada de valores revela el criterio fundamental de la orientación ilegítima: cuando los juicios de valor operan orienta…
Attacking a Straw Man? A theoretical alternative and an exploratory empirical approach on how to “inoculate” students against astrology
Who Says Scientific Laws Are Not Explanatory
Constructivism or Epistemic Advantage, But Not Both
Can we maintain that all knowledge is relative to specific frameworks (such as socially situated standpoints) while also claiming that some frameworks are better than others? This tension risks either circularity—privileging a standpoint by its own standards—or inconsistency, by invoking a non-situated vantage point. Ashton and McKenna propose a solution: some achievements, though rooted in one standpoint, can be evaluated using criteria shared a…
Anti-Intellectualism?” Situating Javier Milei’s Discourse About Science
«Confiabilismo evolucionista» y «positivismo fenomenológico»
En el presente trabajo, intentaremos exponer la oposición entre dos acercamientos al problema de la confiabilidad global de las capacidades cognitivas humanas, y una posible solución a tal conflicto. Por un lado, como señalaremos, existe un número de acercamientos que caen bajo el amplio nombre de “confiabilismo evolucionista” y de acuerdo con los cuales las razones de las que disponemos para creer en la confiabilidad de la cognición humana son d…
Violations of Argumentation Standards in Contemporary Debates on Health and Reproductive Rights
This article presents an exercise in prebunking, a preventive strategy based on inoculation theory (McGuire, 1964), aimed at enhancing cognitive resistance to misinformation. The analysis examines a set of arguments articulated from prejudicial and false information circulating in the debate on the inclusion of trans people in the field of reproductive health and rights. Through an assessment of their underlying premises, logical coherence, and e…
Philosophy (7 works) · Epistemology (6 works) · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies (4 works) · Humanities (4 works) · Philosophy and History of Science (4 works) · Political science (3 works) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (2 works) · Psychology (2 works)