Proximity-centred accessibility – A conceptual debate involving planning practitioners worldwide
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6419656 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Cecilia Silva (0000-0003-2868-1840, Universidade do Porto), Benjamin Büttner (0000-0003-4733-545X, Leipzig University), Sebastian Seisenberger (Technical University of Munich), João Filipe Teixeira (0000-0002-0948-9389, Universidade do Porto), María Teresa Baquero Larriva (0000-0001-5127-5440), María Teresa Baquero-Larriva, Eda Beyazit (0000-0002-5526-501X), Maxime Hachette (0000-0002-0048-7870, Université de Technologie de Compiègne), Diego Hernández (0000-0002-9485-305X, Universidad de la República de Uruguay), Wambũi Kariũki (0000-0002-6773-8857), Patxi J Lamíquiz-Daudén (0000-0003-4725-8829), Jonathan Levine (0000-0003-4646-5463), Jonathan M Levine (0000-0003-2857-7904, Swiss Integrative Center for Human Health), Alain L’hostis (0000-0002-2334-4127, Laboratoire Ville Mobilité Transport), Chunjiang Li (0000-0002-9852-7067), Karel Martens (0000-0002-5690-0556, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology), Juan Carlos Gimeno Martins (0000-0001-6568-5002), Juan Carlos Martín (0000-0002-1475-9857), Lucila Martinazzo (0000-0002-8991-1382), Beatriz Mella Lira (0000-0002-5248-2684), Beatriz Mella-Lira, Louis A Merlin (0000-0002-9267-5712, Institut de Mathématiques de Bordeaux), Dylan Moinse (0000-0002-1916-6989, Laboratoire Ville Mobilité Transport), Fabio Palacio, Roberto Patuelli (0000-0003-1908-4307), Rafael Henrique Moraes Pereira (0000-0003-2125-7465), Miklós Radics (0000-0001-8369-5933, Universidad de Cantabria), Adam Radzimski (0000-0002-3770-4541), Lancelot Rodrigues (0000-0001-6878-3601), Rebecca Rossetti (0000-0001-5656-6650), Matan E Singer (0000-0001-8189-1607), Tuuli Toivonen (0000-0002-6625-4922), Marco Van Burgsteden (0000-0002-5741-8876), Elias Willberg (0000-0003-0159-0084), Tainá Andreoli Bittencourt (0000-0002-9125-2902), Tainá Bittencourt, Yanwei Chai (0000-0003-2513-3769), Aura Reggiani (0000-0002-8288-2187), Dionysis Visvardis |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 167 |
| Páginas | 106376-106376 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-08-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Cities (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0264-2751 • E-ISSN: 1873-6084 |
| Editora | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cities.2025.106376 |
| OpenAlex | W4413636319 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 27 |
In recent years, the concept of proximity has garnered increasing attention in both transportation research and practice, albeit under various terms and interpretations. Among these, the concept of the 15-minute city has catalysed attention in planning practice, with recent evolution to the x-minute city and city of proximities. In research, proximity-centred accessibility has been offered as an umbrella term to express the ability to reach activities and destinations at short distances. Regardless of the terminology used, the essence of proximity lies in the ease with which one can access desired activities and destinations within reasonable travel times, independent of speed-enhancing transport modes most notably through walking. This research investigates the nuanced meanings ascribed to proximity-centred accessibility by planning practitioners globally, spanning diverse regional and local contexts. For this, we used an online survey, disseminated among over 9000 practitioners from 22 countries across 5 continents, which generated over 1300 responses. The survey explored the preferred terms for proximity-centred accessibility and their definitions, specifically emphasizing time and distance thresholds and the identification of relevant activities. By juxtaposing our findings with an earlier survey of accessibility researchers, this study also contributes to the groundwork for a conceptual framework for proximity-centred accessibility. Our findings affirm a relatively consistent interpretation of proximity among global planning practitioners, predominantly extending up to 1600 m, in accordance with earlier results for accessibility researchers. Despite some relevant dissimilarities among practitioners from megacities compared to their smaller city counterparts, or in specific countries (most notably the Netherlands), the distance that is considered proximate is the attribute that generates the most consistent results across different contexts. Also consistent was the relevance of short distances (up to 15 min walking) for activities such as primary and pre-primary schools, playgrounds, parks, food shopping, and pharmacies, reinforcing the importance of proximity to basic and caregiving activities. No term was found to be consistently meaningful across different contexts, although terms like local and neighbourhood accessibility and walking/pedestrian, or cycling accessibility, show higher preference in the global sample
Business · Conceptual framework · Environmental planning · Geography · Political science · Process management · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies · Urban Design and Spatial Analysis · Urban Transport and Accessibility
Causal impacts of multimodal network expansions on urban mobility
Universal or local preferences? The perceived importance of the urban environment on active travel behaviour in Europe across populations
Assessing Urban Functionality Through the 15-Minutes City Lens
What shapes a livable city? Subjective and objective determinants of city satisfaction in Romania
Nonlinear effect of accessibility on car ownership in Beijing
Residential Relocation and Changes in Urban Travel
Minute City
Introducing the “15-Minute City”
Variables communalities and dependence to factors of street system, density, and mixed land use in sustainable site design
Design and planning for accessibility
The insider
Active-transport walking behavior
Operationalizing Neighborhood Accessibility for Land Use-Travel Behavior Research and Regional Modeling
The x-minute city
The law of constant travel time and trip-rates
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 4 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |