Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Concept of Moral Obligation

Bibliographic Data

ID10348166
AuthorsLou Goble
Year2000
Volume60
Issue1
Pages242-242
Publication date2000-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeREVIEW
Review ofThe Concept of Moral Obligation, Michael J Zimmerman, 1996
VenuePhilosophy and Phenomenological Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8205 • E-ISSN: 1933-1592
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/2653451
OpenAlexW1993408985
LanguageEN
Citations received2

The principal aim of this book is to develop and defend an analysis of the concept of moral obligation. The analysis is neutral regarding competing substantive theories of obligation, whether consequentialist or deontological in character. What it seeks to do is generate solutions to a range of philosophical problems concerning obligation and its application. Amongst these problems are deontic paradoxes, the supersession of obligation, conditional obligation, prima facie obligation, actualism and possibilism, dilemmas, supererogation, and cooperation. By virtue of its normative neutrality, the analysis provides a theoretical framework within which competing theories of obligation can be developed and assessed. This study is a major contribution to metaethics that will be of particular interest to all philosophers concerned with normative ethical theory

Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Moral obligation · Obligation · Political science · Free Will and Agency · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • Actualism, Possibilism, and the Nature of Consequentialism

    Yishai Cohen, Travis Timmerman•Oxford Handbook of Consequentialism•2020

  • Deontic Morality and Control

    Open Access•Ishtiyaque Haji•Deontic Morality and Control•2002

  • Justification and the Truth-Connection

    Open Access•Clayton Littlejohn•Justification and the Truth-Connect…•2012

  • I Ought, Therefore I Can

    Open Access•Peter B M Vranas•Philosophical Studies•2007

  • Cooperation, ‘Ought Morally’, and Principles of Moral Harmony

    Open Access•Brian Kierland•Philosophical Studies•2006

  • Does Ought Imply Ought Ought

    Open Access•Daniel Immerman•The Philosophical Quarterly•2018

  • Investigating ethical and motivational influences on consumers’ willingness to purchase the refurbished motorcycle parts

    Open Access•Kuei-Kuei Lai, Kuei‐Kuei Lai et al.•Cleaner and Responsible Consumption•2026

  • Sweatshops and Free Action

    Open Access•Travis Timmerman, Abe Zakhem•Journal of Business Ethics•2021

  • How should we accommodate our future misbehavior? The answer turns on how bad it will be

    Open Access•Daniel Immerman•Philosophical Studies•2020

  • The Probabilistic Nature of Objective Consequentialism

    Open Access•Jean-Paul Vessel, JEAN‐PAUL VESSEL•Theoria•2007

  • A paradox concerning Frankfurt examples

    Open Access•Ishtiyaque Haji•Synthese•2019

  • Ought’ implies ‘can’ against epistemic deontologism

    Open Access•Charles Côté-Bouchard•Synthese•2019

  • Intuitions, reflective judgments, and experimental philosophy

    Open Access•Matthew Hannon•Synthese•2018

  • "Moral Responsibility and "Moral Luck

    Brian Rosebury•The Philosophical Review•1995

  • Ought” Implies “Can” but Does Not Imply “Must”

    Peter B M Vranas•The Philosophical Review•2018

  • Ought' and Ability

    Peter A Graham•The Philosophical Review•2011

  • Being More Realistic About Reasons

    Open Access•Clayton Littlejohn•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2018

  • Darth Vader Made Me Do It! Anakin Skywalker’s Avoidance of Responsibility and the Gray Areas of Hegemonic Masculinity in the Star Wars Universe

    Open Access•Joshua D Atkinson, Joshua Atkinson et al.•Communication Culture and Critique•2009

  • A Cognitive Approach to Moral Responsibility

    Paulo Sousa•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2009

  • Permissibility Is the Only Feasible Deontic Primitive

    Open Access•Johan E Gustafsson•Philosophical Perspectives•2020

  • Enkratic Rationality Is Instrumental Rationality

    Open Access•Wooram Lee•Philosophical Perspectives•2020

  • Intentions, Permissibility, and Choice

    Open Access•Anton Markoč•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2017

  • Against Securitism, the New Breed of Actualism in Consequentialist Thought

    Open Access•Jean-Paul Vessel•Utilitas•2015

  • A Conflict in Common-Sense Moral Psychology

    Open Access•Aaron Z Zimmerman•Utilitas•2009

  • Normative Supervenience and Consequentialism

    Open Access•Krister Bykvist•Utilitas•2003

  • Maximalism and Moral Harmony

    Open Access•Douglas W Portmore•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2016

  • Deliberation, Foreknowledge, and Morality as a Guide to Action

    Open Access•Erik Carlson•Erkenntnis•2002

  • The Good and the Right

    Open Access•Michael J Zimmerman•Utilitas•2007

  • Consequentialism, Alternatives, and Actualism

    Open Access•Erik Carlson•Philosophical Studies•1999

  • The Common Structure of Kantianism and Act-Utilitarianism

    Open Access•Christopher Woodard•Utilitas•2013

  • Defending a possibilist insight in consequentialist thought

    Open Access•Jean-Paul Vessel•Philosophical Studies•2008

  • The Hierarchical Civil Servant

    John Dixon, Yuliya Frolova•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2013

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae