Cross Pressures of Accountability
Initiative, Command, and Failure in the Ron Brown Plane Crash
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10400917 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Barbara S Romzek (University of Kansas), Patricia Wallace Ingraham |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 240-253 |
| Publication date | 2000-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Administration Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/0033-3352.00084 |
| OpenAlex | W2147667270 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 58 |
| References cited | 3 |
Contemporary political rhetoric and management reforms have highlighted accountability issues for government. A troubling feature associated with these management reforms is a gap between the expectations of management reform and the reality of the American culture of accountability. This culture gap is likely to be particularly evident in organizations that are structured around principles of command and control, such as the military. This article explores the cross pressures individuals face when they are urged to demonstrate initiative and obedience to command while operating within a web of accountability relationships that represent several different behavioral standards against which their performance can be judged. To conduct this research, the authors interviewed members of the Accident Investigation Board appointed by Major General Ryan, Commander of the United States Air Force Europe (USAFE), to investigate the April 1996 crash in Croatia of the military transport plane carrying United States Secretary of Commerce Ron Brown and his party of distinguished visitors. These personal interviews were supplemented with the official reports of the Accident Investigation Board and transcripts of testimony before the Board. Based on these data, we analyze the accountability dynamics involving the various military officials associated with the “mishap flight.” We find that while institutional rhetoric and managerial conditions encouraged entrepreneurial behavior and initiative, the administrative reality still emphasized a risk‐averse, rules‐oriented approach to accountability when things went wrong
Accountability · Crash · Government (linguistics · Obedience · Political science · Public relations · Rhetoric · Law · Management and Organizational Studies · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research
Embracing Watershed Politics
Special Issue on ‘Welfare governance reforms and effects in the Post-Golden Age’
How quality reporting reduces accountability deficit and overload
Accountability intensity and bureaucrats’ response to conflicting expectations
Holding back the damage
Mechanisms of perceived accountability in Korean NPOs
A Scoping Review of Accountability in Social Entrepreneurship
Program Accountability as an Emergent Property
Pathologies of Accountability
A Theory of Culture‐switching
Sensemaking and the political–administrative interface
Responsive, responsible and respected government
Dynamics of Public Sector Accountability in an Era of Reform
An empirical analysis of innovativeness in government
Conceptual Bases of Employee Accountability
The Bureaucratic Politics of Cyber Strategy
Public caseworkers' strategies coping with accountability demands
Independent Labels? The Power behind Environmental Information about Products and Companies
A Generic Multiple Constituency Matrix
Resolving Accountability Ambiguity in Nonprofit Organizations
Publishing public performance results on the Internet
Collaborative accountability for sustainable public health
Assessing Administrative Accountability
Analyzing Accountability Relationships in a Crisis
Mutual Accountability between Governments and Nonprofits
Impact of Competing Accountability Requirements on Perceived Work Performance
Accountability through public participation? Experiences from the ten-thousand-citizen review in Nanjing, China
Public Sector Reforms and Financial Transparency
Further Understanding Accountability in Public Organizations
Formal and Informal Accountabilities and Accountability Management
Understanding Accountability and Governance in Post-invasion Iraq
Two Models of Teacher Accountability
Move Over Daniel
Marketization and Varieties of Accountability Relationships in Employment Services
Emergent Accountability in State–Local Relations
Accounting for Accountability
The Accountability Paradox in an Age of Reinvention
Structure and Network Performance
Daring to be a Daniel
Financial Accountability and European Union Cohesion Policy
Public governance tensions
Accountability and monitoring government in the digital era
Do crises help remedy regulatory failure? A comparative study of the Walkerton water and Jerusalem banquet hall disasters
Understanding Accountability in Democratic Governance
Managerial Values and Accountability Pressures
Accountability of Congressional Staff
Transparent government
Accountability of Business Improvement District in Urban Governance Networks
Regulatory regimes and accountability
To Manage Is to Govern
Responsiveness to Reform Values
The “Guarding the Guardians” Problem
Accountable Agents
Extra‐Network Organizational Reputation and Blame Avoidance in Networks
Abu Ghraib A Case of Moral and Administrative Failure
A Comprehensive Accountability Framework for Public Administrators
Wrestling with multiple accountabilities in times of crisis
Look Before You Leap
| Unique citing works | 58 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2.23 |
| Citation span | 2000 - 2025 (26) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 57 |