Addendum to the Educational Goods Framework
The call for guidance for collective decision-making
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11953442 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ka Ya Lee (0000-0003-1761-3340, Faculty of Education, The University of Hong Kong , Room 425, Runme Shaw Building, 90 Bonham Road, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong , , 999077, corresponding author), Meaghan Malloy (Department of Education, Practice and Society, UCL Institute of Education , 20 Bedford Way, London, WC1H 0AL) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-18 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Philosophy of Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0309-8249 • E-ISSN: 1467-9752 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jopedu/qhag003 |
| OpenAlex | W7131277119 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
This article focuses on the four-step schema introduced by Harry Brighouse, Helen F. Ladd, Susanna Loeb, and Adam Swift for operationalizing the Educational Goods Framework and making ‘value-led and data-informed’ decisions in education. The four steps are (1) identify the main values at play; (2) identify the key decisions relevant to those values; (3) assess the options in light of the values and evidence; and (4) establish what is the best policy overall in the circumstances. In this article, we point out the ambiguities in this four-step approach and argue that its lack of clarity carries the danger of causing ethical problems in certain real-world educational contexts. We demonstrate our points through two cases in El Salvador, a country with non-ideal features that render it challenging to implement Brighouse and Swift’s idealized vision of rational, impartial, and informed decision-making processes. We conclude with a call for adding normative guidance on collective decision-making as an addendum to the Educational Goods Framework and note its potential utility in contexts beyond El Salvador
Bespoke · CLARITY · Goods and services · Normative · Operationalization · Opposition (politics · Schema (genetic algorithms · Global Educational Policies and Reforms · Human Rights and Development · Peace and Human Rights Education
Ghosts in the Schoolyard
Educational Goods
What's Wrong with Tuition‐Free Four‐Year Public College
Capabilities, Lists, and Public Reason
Between equality and freedom of choice
The geometry of policy implementation
The problem with faith-based carve-outs
Indigenous Economies, Theories of Subsistence, and Women
Fighting invisibility
| Highly cited | No |
|---|