Differential weighting in choice versus advice
I’ll do this, you do that
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12166152 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Laura J Kray (0000-0003-3428-4454, Northwestern University), Laura Kray, Richard Gonzalez (0000-0001-6334-0430, University of Michigan, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 207-218 |
| Publication date | 1999-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(199909)12:3<207::aid-bdm322>3.0.co;2-p |
| OpenAlex | W1997365507 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 39 |
| References cited | 17 |
We propose that when individuals make a decision for themselves they weight attributes more uniformly compared to when they give advice. In Study 1, 138 participants were given a hypothetical choice between two jobs varying on two dimensions and asked either to choose for themselves, offer advice to a best friend, or offer advice to an acquaintance. We hypothesized that respondents offering advice would favor the option with the higher value on the more important dimension. More participants in the acquaintance condition recommended the job with a higher value on the important dimension than participants making the choice for themselves. Study 2 (N=62) tested the hypothesis in a situation where the options consisted of three dimensions. One option was relatively high on two of the three dimensions and the other option was relatively high on the remaining ‘socially important’, or ‘prominent’, dimension. The uniform weighting hypothesis for self-choice predicts higher frequency of choice for the former option. Data were consistent with this prediction. Study 3 (N=170) tested the hypothesis in students' choice of major at the university. We made use of an actual event, a pending university budget cut, that would require some students to change majors. Participants either made the decision for themselves, made a recommendation to a student in their same department, or made a recommendation to a student in another department facing the analogous dilemma. Replicating the findings of the first two studies, participants offering advice to a student in another department suggested staying with their current major significantly more than participants making the choice for themselves. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Actuarial science · Advice (programming · Differential (mechanical device · Dilemma · Dimension (graph theory · Economics · Statistics · Value (mathematics · Weighting · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Psychology of Social Influence · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Decision Vacuums in the Provision of Abortion Care
Determinants of Online Medical Decisions for Older Parents
Risk Preference in Making Romantic Relationship Decisions for Others with Different Psychological Distance
Idealistic advice and pragmatic choice
Don’t Be My Neighbor
The effect of malicious envy on sequential moral decision-making
Investigating stability in ethical ideologies as moral personalities
Absolute outcome or relative standing? The difference between making decisions for the self and other
Consulting Multiple Advisors
Lay rationalism and inconsistency between predicted experience and decision
Advice to friends in want/should conflicts
The Impact of Depression on Self–Other Discrepancies in Decision Making
The role of self-esteem and anxiety in decision making for self versus others in relationships
A behavioral account of compensation awarding decisions
Self–other differences in multiattribute decision making
The gap between medical and monetary choices under risk persists in decisions for others
Improving judgement with prepaid expert advice
The Compromise Effect in Choosing for Others
If I do not bear such a burden today, I will bear it in the future
Self-Other Decision Making Difference
Cognitive processes underlying the self-other perspective in women's judgments of sexual victimization risk
Promoting later planned retirement
Third-party decision-making under risk as a function of prior gains and losses
Decision making for others involving risk
Safety First? The Role of Emotion in Safety Product Betrayal Aversion
Effects of Construal Level on the Price-Quality Relationship
Knowing Too Much
Goal Management in Sequential Choices
Why Feasibility Matters More to Gift Receivers than to Givers
Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension
Advisors want their advice to be used – but not too much
Information distortion in self-other decision making
Sunk cost effects for thee but not for me
Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
Advice taking and decision-making
You Will Not Remember This
Power and Need-for-Justification
What makes consumers take risks in self–other purchase decision making? The roles of impression management and self-construal
Guilt and shame across cultures
A fundamental prediction error
Contingent weighting in judgment and choice.
Giving advice
Giving advice
Rape prevention and self-defense
They saw a negotiation
Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control
Familiarity and differences in self- and other-representations
Reasoning and the weighting of attributes in attitude judgments
| Unique citing works | 39 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,7 |
| Citation span | 2003 - 2026 (24) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 34 |