Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Differential weighting in choice versus advice

I’ll do this, you do that

Bibliographic Data

ID12166152
AuthorsLaura J Kray (0000-0003-3428-4454, Northwestern University), Laura Kray, Richard Gonzalez (0000-0001-6334-0430, University of Michigan, corresponding author)
Year1999
Volume12
Issue3
Pages207-218
Publication date1999-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Behavioral Decision Making (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0894-3257 • E-ISSN: 1099-0771
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(199909)12:3<207::aid-bdm322>3.0.co;2-p
OpenAlexW1997365507
LanguageEN
Citations received39
References cited17

We propose that when individuals make a decision for themselves they weight attributes more uniformly compared to when they give advice. In Study 1, 138 participants were given a hypothetical choice between two jobs varying on two dimensions and asked either to choose for themselves, offer advice to a best friend, or offer advice to an acquaintance. We hypothesized that respondents offering advice would favor the option with the higher value on the more important dimension. More participants in the acquaintance condition recommended the job with a higher value on the important dimension than participants making the choice for themselves. Study 2 (N=62) tested the hypothesis in a situation where the options consisted of three dimensions. One option was relatively high on two of the three dimensions and the other option was relatively high on the remaining ‘socially important’, or ‘prominent’, dimension. The uniform weighting hypothesis for self-choice predicts higher frequency of choice for the former option. Data were consistent with this prediction. Study 3 (N=170) tested the hypothesis in students' choice of major at the university. We made use of an actual event, a pending university budget cut, that would require some students to change majors. Participants either made the decision for themselves, made a recommendation to a student in their same department, or made a recommendation to a student in another department facing the analogous dilemma. Replicating the findings of the first two studies, participants offering advice to a student in another department suggested staying with their current major significantly more than participants making the choice for themselves. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Actuarial science · Advice (programming · Differential (mechanical device · Dilemma · Dimension (graph theory · Economics · Statistics · Value (mathematics · Weighting · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Psychology of Social Influence · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Decision Vacuums in the Provision of Abortion Care

    Open Access•Allison Earl, Sara I Mcclelland•Policy Insights from the…•2026

  • Determinants of Online Medical Decisions for Older Parents

    Open Access•Bonan Fan, Weifang Song et al.•SAGE Open•2024

  • Risk Preference in Making Romantic Relationship Decisions for Others with Different Psychological Distance

    Wei Zhang, Yongfang Liu et al.•Acta Psychologica Sinica•2014

  • Idealistic advice and pragmatic choice

    Shai Danziger, Ronit Montal et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2012

  • Don’t Be My Neighbor

    Open Access•Shahin Davoudpour•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2023

  • The effect of malicious envy on sequential moral decision-making

    Open Access•Aihong Li, Saihong Li et al.•Current Psychology•2026

  • Investigating stability in ethical ideologies as moral personalities

    Open Access•Tuheena Mukherjee, Ayesh Kanta Padhi•Current Psychology•2023

  • Absolute outcome or relative standing? The difference between making decisions for the self and other

    Open Access•Haihong Li, Xiaofei Xie•Current Psychology•2023

  • Consulting Multiple Advisors

    Open Access•Mauricio Palmeira, Gerri Spassova•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2024

  • Lay rationalism and inconsistency between predicted experience and decision

    Open Access•Christopher K Hsee, Jiao Zhang et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2003

  • Advice to friends in want/should conflicts

    Open Access•Todd J Thorsteinson, Franklin L Sturgeon et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2020

  • The Impact of Depression on Self–Other Discrepancies in Decision Making

    Open Access•Rocio Garcia-Retamero, Rocio Garcia‐retamero et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2014

  • The role of self-esteem and anxiety in decision making for self versus others in relationships

    Open Access•Laura Wray-Lake, Laura D Wray et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2005

  • A behavioral account of compensation awarding decisions

    Open Access•Claire I Tsai, Christopher K Hsee•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2008

  • Self–other differences in multiattribute decision making

    Open Access•Curtis D Von Gunten, Laura D Scherer•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2018

  • The gap between medical and monetary choices under risk persists in decisions for others

    Open Access•Nathalie Popović, Thorsten Pachur et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2019

  • Improving judgement with prepaid expert advice

    Open Access•Janet A Sniezek, Gunnar E Schrah et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2004

  • The Compromise Effect in Choosing for Others

    Open Access•Chung‐Chau Chang, Shih-Chieh Chuang et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2011

  • If I do not bear such a burden today, I will bear it in the future

    Open Access•Bodunrin Akinrinmade, Stephanie S Zuilkowski•International Journal of…•2025

  • Self-Other Decision Making Difference

    Jing-Zhe XU, Xiaofei Xie et al.•Acta Psychologica Sinica•2012

  • Cognitive processes underlying the self-other perspective in women's judgments of sexual victimization risk

    Open Access•Jenny K Rinehart, Elizabeth A Yeater et al.•Journal of Social and Personal…•2018

  • Promoting later planned retirement

    Open Access•Ron J G van Schie, Benedict G C Dellaert et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2015

  • Third-party decision-making under risk as a function of prior gains and losses

    Open Access•Annabel B Losecaat Vermeer, Maarten A S Boksem et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2020

  • Decision making for others involving risk

    Open Access•Evan Polman, Kaiyang Wu•Journal of Economic Psychology•2020

  • Safety First? The Role of Emotion in Safety Product Betrayal Aversion

    Andrew D Gershoff, Jonathan J Koehler•Journal of Consumer Research•2011

  • Effects of Construal Level on the Price-Quality Relationship

    Dengfeng Yan, Jaideep Sengupta•Journal of Consumer Research•2011

  • Knowing Too Much

    Ravi Mehta, Joandrea Hoegg et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2011

  • Goal Management in Sequential Choices

    Juliano Laran•Journal of Consumer Research•2010

  • Why Feasibility Matters More to Gift Receivers than to Givers

    Ernest Baskin, Cheryl J Wakslak et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2014

  • Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension

    Open Access•Ido Liviatan, Yaacov Trope et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2008

  • Advisors want their advice to be used – but not too much

    Open Access•Fabian Ache, Christina Rader et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2020

  • Information distortion in self-other decision making

    Open Access•Evan Polman•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009

  • Sunk cost effects for thee but not for me

    Open Access•Zhiqin Chen, Şule Güney et al.•Acta Psychologica•2024

  • Construal-level theory of psychological distance.

    Yaacov Trope, Nira Liberman•Psychological Review•2010

  • Advice taking and decision-making

    Open Access•Silvia Bonaccio, Reeshad S Dalal•Organizational Behavior and Human…•2006

  • You Will Not Remember This

    Open Access•Maferima Touré-Tillery, Maferima Touré‐Tillery et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2021

  • Power and Need-for-Justification

    Open Access•Linying Fan, Derek D Rucker et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2023

  • What makes consumers take risks in self–other purchase decision making? The roles of impression management and self-construal

    Open Access•Hayea Kim•Social Behavior and Personality…•2022

  • Guilt and shame across cultures

    Open Access•Tae Hyun Baek, Yung Kyun Choi et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • A fundamental prediction error

    Christopher K Hsee, Elke U Weber•Journal of Experimental…•1997

  • Contingent weighting in judgment and choice.

    Amos Tversky, Shmuel Sattath et al.•Psychological Review•1988

  • Giving advice

    Baruch Fischhoff•American Psychologist•1992

  • Giving advice

    Baruch Fischhoff•American Psychologist•1992

  • Rape prevention and self-defense

    Open Access•Lita Furby, Baruch Fischhoff et al.•Women s Studies International Forum•1991

  • They saw a negotiation

    Leigh Thompson•Journal of Personality and Social…•1995

  • Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control

    Peter M Gollwitzer, Ronald F Kinney•Journal of Personality and Social…•1989

  • Familiarity and differences in self- and other-representations

    Deborah A Prentice•Journal of Personality and Social…•1990

  • Reasoning and the weighting of attributes in attitude judgments

    Gary M Levine, Jamin Halberstadt et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1996

Unique citing works39
Citations per year1,7
Citation span2003 - 2026 (24)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 34

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae