Differences between resource control types revisited
A short term longitudinal study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12686451 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Albert Reijntjes (0000-0002-5111-672X, Utrecht University, corresponding author), Marjolijn Vermande (Utrecht University), Marjolijn M Vermande (0000-0002-2138-9452, Utrecht University), Tjeert Olthof (0000-0002-4965-1555, VU University Amsterdam), Frits A Goossens (0000-0002-6991-0825, VU University Amsterdam), Gerko Vink (0000-0001-9767-1924, Utrecht University), Liesbeth Aleva (Utrecht University), Matty Van Der Meulen (University of Groningen) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 187-200 |
| Publication date | 2017-08-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1467-9507 • E-ISSN: 0961-205X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/sode.12257 |
| OpenAlex | W2744731640 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 21 |
| References cited | 33 |
Hawley's influential resource control theory (RCT) posits that both coercive and prosocial strategies may yield social dominance, as indexed by resource control. Based on differences in youths’ relative use of these strategies, RCT a priori defines five distinct subtypes. Several studies by Hawley and colleagues have revealed substantial differences between subtypes in terms of obtained resource control and various social characteristics (e.g., agreeableness). The present longitudinal study (N = 394; M age = 10.3; SD = 0.5) expands on previous work. Firstly, because several items used to assess strategies in RCT appear to confound strategy use with the resulting benefits (resource control), we disentangled between strategy use as such and obtained resource control. Secondly whereas previous work has been exclusively cross‐sectional, the present study was longitudinal. ANOVAs comparing subgroups provided support for some core tenets of RCT, but not for others. For instance, bistrategic children scored high on both resource control and perceived popularity. However, bistrategics engaged in elevated bullying, and whereas Hawley asserts that they are proficient in balancing ‘getting ahead’ with ‘getting along’, their behavior appeared to evoke clear negative reactions in the peer group at large. Findings also showed that non‐controllers did not experience more negative outcomes than their peers across all domains
Control (management · Developmental psychology · Dominance (genetics · Longitudinal study · Prosocial behavior · Randomized controlled trial · Resource (disambiguation · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression · Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology
Criminal Behavior - The Underlyings, and Contemporary Applications
Sociometric Status in Bullying Perpetrators
Social advantages and disadvantages associated with cyber aggression-victimization
Preference and popularity as distinct forms of status
An Evolutionary Perspective on Bullying and Social Power
A Test of the Bistrategic Control Hypothesis of Adolescent Popularity
Social goals and gains of adolescent bullying and aggression
Exploring social goal orientations, self‐perceptions and popularity with students attending regular and special education schools
Prosocial, aggressive, or both? A multilevel latent profile analysis of peer status and social behavior in early adolescence
A ‘Cool’ Kid Wears a Brand, and Everyone’s following Him” Hierarchal Social Status in Preadolescence
Self-esteem importance beliefs
The participant roles of bullying in different grades
Halo and association effects
Differences in adolescents’ motivations for indirect, direct, and hybrid peer defending
Evolutionarily relevant aggressive functions
Social skills moderate the time‐varying association between aggression and peer rejection among children with and without ADHD
Heterogeneity of Social Marginalization in Early Adolescence
Examining Social Status Profiles with Gender, School Attended, SES, Academic Achievement and Wellbeing in Urban China
Is Inspiring Group Members an Effective Predictor of Social Dominance in Early Adolescence? Direct and Moderated Effects of Behavioral Strategies, Social Skills, and Gender on Resource Control and Popularity
The Moderating Role of Clique Hierarchical Organization on Resource Control by Central Clique Members
Defending victims of bullying in the classroom
Bullying in American Schools
A Large-Scale Evaluation of the KiVa Antibullying Program
The allure of a mean friend
Bullying as strategic behavior
From Censure to Reinforcement
Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations
Prosocial and Coercive Configurations of Resource Control in Early Adolescence
Differential Premises Arising from Differential Socialization of the Sexes
Mice
Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys
The roles of aggressive and affiliative behaviors in resource control
The Ontogenesis of Social Dominance
Preschoolers' Bistrategic Resource Control, Reconciliation, and Peer Regard
Methodological Issues in the Use of Peer Sociometric Nominations with Middle School Youth
Gendered Social Worlds in Preschool
Assertion strategies and aggression during early childhood
Differential Personality Correlates of Early Adolescents’ Bullying-Related Outsider and Defender Behavior
Sociometric Popularity and Peer-Perceived Popularity
At what age are children most likely to be bullied at school
| Unique citing works | 21 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,63 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 21 |