Linking Supervisor and Subordinate’s Negative Work–Family Experience
The Role of Family Supportive Supervisor Behavior
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12793330 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Su-Ying Pan (0000-0003-0911-3741, Macau University of Science and Technology, corresponding author), Aichia Chuang (0000-0002-3849-219X, University of North Carolina at Greensboro), Ying‐jung Yeh (National Taiwan University of Science and Technology) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 17-30 |
| Publication date | 2020-08-26 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1548-0518 • E-ISSN: 1939-7089 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1548051820950375 |
| OpenAlex | W3081479227 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 70 |
In the past decade, family supportive supervisor behavior (FSSB) has emerged as an important factor that can help employees manage work–family needs. Although the existing literature has documented the benefits of FSSB, we know little about the emerging process of FSSB. Drawing on the conservation of resources theory, we propose that supervisor engagement in FSSB is influenced by the extent to which the supervisor has sufficient resources for work. This study uses the joint effect of supervisors’ family–work conflict (FWC) and organizational work–family culture to predict the time supervisors spend on core tasks, FSSB, and subordinates’ work–family conflict (WFC), in sequence. Data were collected from paired supervisor–subordinate dyads among 83 supervisors and 276 subordinates. The results indicate that supervisors with high FWC spend more time on core tasks and display less FSSB, which ultimately result in higher subordinates’ WFC, especially in organizations with a lower level of organizational work–family culture. In contrast, supervisors’ FWC does not result in any negative influences on the supervisors themselves or their subordinates at work in organizations with a higher level of organizational work–family culture. Therefore, the theoretical model provides evidence that supervisors’ negative work–family experience cascades down to their subordinates
Conservation of resources theory · Management · Organizational culture · Political science · Public relations · Supervisor · Work (physics · Work–family conflict · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Psychology · Social Psychology · Work-Family Balance Challenges · Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents
Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload
Structural Equation Modeling in Management Research
A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations.
The potential paradox of organizational citizenship behavior
RMediation
Resources, coping strategies, and emotional exhaustion
Getting to the “COR”
The work-family interface and job performance
Family-Supportive Work Environments
The Conservation of Resources Model Applied to Work–Family Conflict and Strain
When Work–Family Benefits Are Not Enough
To Parcel or Not to Parcel
Developing and Testing an Integrative Model of the Work–Family Interface
Family‐supportive supervisor behaviors
Job insecurity and crossover of burnout in married couples
Family friendly work practices, organizational climate, and firm performance
The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics
Long work hours
Antecedents of work–family conflict
Putting work and family experiences in context
Stress and Strain Crossover
The crossover of burnout and work engagement among working couples
| Citations per year | 0.75 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2023 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |