Exploring Arguments Presented in Predatory Journals Using Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12839686 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Saman Ebadi (0000-0001-8623-7751, Razi University, corresponding author), Soroor Ashtarian (Razi University), Gerannaz Zamani (Razi University) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 435-449 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-13 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Academic Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1570-1727 • E-ISSN: 1572-8544 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10805-019-09346-0 |
| OpenAlex | W2999266981 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 24 |
Argumentation theory · Epistemology · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Philosophy · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy
The Uses of Argument
The Skills of Argument
TAPping into argumentation
Who's Afraid of Peer Review?
‘Predatory’ open access
Predatory publishers are corrupting open access
Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms
Making sense of argumentation and explanation
Discourses in Place
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis
| Citations per year | 0.6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2023 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |