The “Ambivalence” of Joint Activity as the Basis of the Emergence of Psychological Neoformations
Ways of Developing the Activity Approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12944249 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Н Н Нечаев (Moscow State University of Psychology & Education, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 27-37 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cultural-Historical Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1816-5435 • E-ISSN: 2224-8935 |
| Publisher | Moscow State University of Psychology and Education (PUBLISHER • RU) |
| DOI | 10.17759/chp.2020160304 |
| OpenAlex | W3093575660 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 4 |
The article addresses the methodological status of the category of joint activity which, obviously, opens up new possibilities to consider the psychological mechanisms of a person’s development. Special attention is paid to the content of the concepts “object of activity” and “subject of activity”, which determine the comprehension of the main characteristics of activity as a process of instrumental transformation of the activity object into its subject, so that the latter embodies the mode of activity used for its creation. The key points of the activity approach by A.N. Leontiev are considered, especially those concerning the sources and conditions of activity development as well as its psychological mechanism which determines the inner dynamics of this contradictory process. These contradictions arise in the course of changes within the subject-tool and communication components of the joint activity, which act, respectively, as the leading forms of transformation of the subject reality and as the means of organizing the interaction of the persons involved into the shared performance of joint activity tasks solution. It is emphasized that the dual nature of activity as a whole including its subject-tool and communication components is fully expressed through a mode of activity, created by person. Contradictions arising in the subject-tool and in communicative component are resolved by their mutually conditioning transformations. This leads to a change in the motivational basis of the subject activity, which determines the development of the subject-tool component of the modes of activity, which, in turn, leads to the development of modes of communicative regulation of the system of relations
Activity Theory · Ambivalence · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Comprehension · Epistemology · Object (grammar · Process (computing · Subject (documents · Computer Science · Educational Methods and Teacher Development · Psycholinguistics and Behavioral Studies · Psychology · Psychology of Development and Education · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
The Approaches of L.S. Vygotsky and J. Bowlby to Infant Development
Cultural-Historical Psychology (L.S.Vygotsky, A.R.Luria, A.N. Leontiev) Based on the Activity Approach of V.V.Davydov in the Program of V.V. Rubtsov's Development of Socio-Genetic Psychology
The role of video fragments of activity in collaborative solving of experimental-research tasks by adolescents
Activity mastering vs. digitalized primitivization in education in the context of cultural-historical psychology / El dominio de la actividad frente a la primitivización digitalizada en la educación en el contexto de la psicología histórico-cultural
Cultural-Historical Psychology of Mastering Activity and Alternatives to Digitalization
Genesis and Current State of Joint Activities in Educational Conditions
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |