Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Interaction Between Work-Nonwork Balance Crafting and Segmentation Preferences When Predicting Work-Nonwork Balance

Bibliographic Data

ID13660229
AuthorsArūnas Žiedelis (0000-0002-7367-9988, Vilnius University, corresponding author), Jurgita Lazauskaitė‐Zabielskė (0000-0003-2926-482X, Vilnius University), Ieva Urbanaviciute (0000-0002-1077-2632, Vilnius University), Rita Žiauberytė-Jakštienė (0009-0003-9744-5283, Vilnius University)
Year2025
Pages332941251399559-332941251399559
Publication date2025-11-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Reports (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00332941251399559
PMID41240322
OpenAlexW4416247153
LanguageEN
References cited44

In today's world of work, employees are increasingly perceived as proactive individuals who can achieve work-nonwork balance through crafting. However, the effectiveness of different proactive efforts is not fully known. Integrating the concept of work-nonwork balance crafting into a theoretical framework based on the self-regulatory focus theory, we aimed to evaluate and compare the predictive effects of distinct prevention- and promotion-focused work-nonwork balance crafting strategies on the work-nonwork balance among employees with varying preferences for segmenting work and nonwork domains. A diverse sample of 1,303 employees participated in our study by responding to items measuring their work-nonwork balance crafting strategies, work-nonwork balance, and segmentation preferences. Correlational and moderation analyses were used to test our study hypotheses. Results revealed that prevention-focused nonwork boundary crafting was most strongly related to work-nonwork balance, followed by prevention-focused work boundary crafting, and the effect of promotion-focused work boundary crafting had only a minor effect. In most cases, crafting strategies were more beneficial for employees with low segmentation preferences than those with high segmentation preferences. Thus, proactive efforts to protect work and nonwork domains from each other seem to be an effective balancing strategy, especially among domain integrators. The obtained results expand the theoretical framework of job crafting and complement the field of crafting research by shedding light on the effectiveness of different crafting strategies and the role of individual differences in boundary management

Balance (ability · Boundary (topology · Field (mathematics · Market segmentation · Moderation · Segmentation · Work (physics · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Work-Family Balance Challenges · Workaholism, burnout, and well-being

  • A Role–resource Approach–avoidance Model of Job Crafting

    Patrick F Bruning, Michael A Campion•Academy of Management Journal•2018

  • Social comparison on social networking sites

    Open Access•Philippe Verduyn, Nino Gugushvili et al.•Current Opinion in Psychology•2020

  • Regulatory Focus Theory

    Open Access•Joel Brockner, E Tory Higgins•Organizational Behavior and Human…•2001

  • In Search of Balance

    Open Access•Julie Holliday Wayne, Marcus M Butts et al.•Personnel Psychology•2017

  • The jingle-jangle of work–nonwork balance

    Wendy J Casper, Hoda Vaziri et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2018

  • Development and validation of the job crafting scale

    Open Access•Maria Tims, Arnold B Bakker et al.•Journal of Vocational Behavior•2012

  • Crafting a Job

    Amy Wrzesniewski, Jane E Dutton•Academy of Management Review•2001

  • A meta-analysis on promotion- and prevention-focused job crafting

    Philipp W Lichtenthaler, Andrea Fischbach•European Journal of Work and…•2019

  • Managing boundaries for well-being

    Open Access•Sophie E Brogle, Philipp Kerksieck et al.•Current Psychology•2024

  • Work-nonwork balance

    Open Access•Julie Holliday Wayne, Hoda Vaziri et al.•Journal of Vocational Behavior•2021

  • The process of reinventing a job

    Open Access•Alessandra Lazazzara, Maria Tims et al.•Journal of Vocational Behavior•2020

  • Work-Life Balance

    Open Access•M Joseph Sirgy, Dong‐jin Lee et al.•Applied Research in Quality of Life•2017

  • Boundary Management and Work‐Nonwork Balance While Working from Home

    Open Access•Tammy D Allen, Kelsey Merlo et al.•Applied Psychology•2020

  • Work–Family Boundary Dynamics

    Tammy D Allen, E Cho et al.•Annual Review of Organizational…•2014

  • A new perspective on balancing life domains

    Open Access•Philipp Kerksieck, Miika Kujanpää et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • Reorienting job crafting research

    Open Access•Fangfang Zhang, K Parker•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2018

  • A meta‐analytic investigation of the personal and work‐related antecedents of work–family balance

    Open Access•Hoda Vaziri, Julie Holliday Wayne et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2021

  • Consequences of work‐home segmentation or integration

    Open Access•Glen E Kreiner•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2006

  • Work/Family Border Theory

    Open Access•Sue Campbell Clark•Human Relations•2000

  • Crafting a balance between work and home

    Open Access•Jane Sturges•Human Relations•2012

  • From job crafting to home crafting

    Open Access•Evangelia Demerouti, Rebecca Hewett et al.•Human Relations•2020

  • Crafting one’s leisure time in response to high job strain

    Open Access•Paraskevas Petrou, Arnold B Bakker•Human Relations•2016

  • Beyond pleasure and pain

    E Tory Higgins•American Psychologist•1997

  • Multiple Roles and the Self

    Stephen R Mark, Stephen R Marks et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•1996

  • In search of the perfect manager? Work-life balance and managerial work

    Open Access•Jackie Ford, David Collinson•Work Employment and Society•2011

  • Work-life balance crafting during Covid-19

    Jaimee Felice Caringal-Go, Jaimee Felice Caringal‐go et al.•Community Work & Family•2022

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae