Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Are students ready for meaningful use

Bibliographic Data

ID15328455
AuthorsGary Ferenchick (0000-0002-6899-4713, Michigan State University, corresponding author), Gary S Ferenchick, David Solomons (0000-0002-3130-5240, Michigan State University), David Solomon (0000-0002-7015-3649), Asad Mohmand (Virginia Commonwealth University), Basim Towfiq (Hurley Medical Center), Kevin Kavanaugh (Michigan State University), Larry Warbasse (Munson Medical Center), James Addison (Marquette General Hospital), Frances Chames (Michigan State University)
Year2013
Volume18
Issue1
Pages22495-22495
Publication date2013-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Education Online (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1087-2981 • E-ISSN: 1087-2981
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3402/meo.v18i0.22495
OpenAlexW2060909664
LanguageEN
References cited9

BackgroundThe meaningful use (MU) of electronic medical records (EMRs) is being implemented in three stages. Key objectives of stage one include electronic analysis of data entered into structured fields, using decision-support tools (e.g., checking drug–drug interactions [DDI]) and electronic information exchange.ObjectiveThe authors assessed the performance of medical students on 10 stage-one MU tasks and measured the correlation between students’ MU performance and subsequent end-of-clerkship professionalism assessments and their grades on an end-of-year objective structured clinical examination.ParticipantsTwo-hundred and twenty-two third-year medical students on the internal medicine (IM) clerkship.Design/main measuresFrom July 2010 to February 2012, all students viewed 15 online tutorials covering MU competencies. The authors measured student MU documentation and performance in the chart of a virtual patient using a fully functional training EMR. Specific MU measurements included, adding: a new problem, a new medication, an advanced directive, smoking status, the results of screening tests; and performing a DDI (in which a major interaction was probable), and communicating a plan for this interaction.Key resultsA total of 130 MU errors were identified. Sixty-eight (30.6%) students had at least one error, and 30 (13.5%) had more than one (range 2–6). Of the 130 errors, 90 (69.2%) were errors in structured data entry. Errors occurred in medication dosing and instructions (18%), DDI identification (12%), documenting smoking status (15%), and colonoscopy results (23%). Students with MU errors demonstrated poorer performance on end-of-clerkship professionalism assessments (r =−0.112, p=0.048) and lower observed structured clinical examination (OSCE) history-taking skills (r =−0.165, p=0.008) and communication scores (r= − 0.173, p=0.006).ConclusionsMU errors among medical students are common and correlate with subsequent poor performance in multiple educational domains. These results indicate that without assessment and feedback, a substantial minority of students may not be ready to progress to more advanced MU tasks

Curriculum · Documentation · Educational measurement · Family medicine · Medical education · Medical record · MEDLINE · Objective structured clinical examination · Computer Science · Electronic Health Records Systems · Health Sciences Research and Education · Medicine · Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes · Psychology · Surgery

  • The “Meaningful Use” Regulation for Electronic Health Records

    David Blumenthal, Marilyn Tavenner•New England Journal of Medicine•2010

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae