Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Bright and Dark Sides of Resources for Cross-Role Interrupting Behaviors and Work–Family Conflict

Preliminary Multigroup Findings on Remote and Traditional Working

Bibliographic Data

ID15463515
AuthorsFerdinando Paolo Santarpia (0000-0003-0363-284X, Sapienza University of Rome, corresponding author), Laura Borgogni (0000-0001-6909-4250, Sapienza University of Rome), Chiara Consiglio (0000-0001-7124-908X, Sapienza University of Rome), Pietro Menatta (0000-0002-6710-2568, Sapienza University of Rome)
Year2021
Volume18
Issue22
Pages12207-12207
Publication date2021-11-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
PublisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph182212207
PMID34831962
OpenAlexW3216998859
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited55

Using boundary management and conservation of resources theories, we examined how job resources (i.e., job autonomy and goal-oriented leadership) and a work-related personal resource (i.e., personal initiative at work) relate to cross-role interrupting behaviors-i.e., interrupting the work (or non-work) role to attend to competing non-work (or work) demands-and how, in turn, they correlate with work-family conflict. Furthermore, we examined differences in the proposed nomological network between workers adopting traditional and remote ways of working. Using a multigroup structural equation modelling approach on a sample of 968 employees from an Italian telecommunications company, we found that: (a) job autonomy was positively related to both work interrupting non-work behaviors and to non-work interrupting work behaviors, (b) goal-oriented leadership was negatively related to non-work interrupting work behaviors, (c) personal initiative at work was positively related to work interrupting non-work behaviors and, finally, (d) cross-role interrupting behaviors were positively related to work-family conflict. Additionally, our findings revealed previously undocumented results; (a) mediating patterns in how resources relate, through cross-role interrupting behaviors, to work-family conflict and (b) non-invariant associations among job autonomy, cross-role interrupting behaviors and work-family conflict across traditional and remote workers. The limitations and theoretical and practical implications of the present study are discussed

Autonomy · Political science · Structural equation modeling · Work (physics · Work behavior · Work–family conflict · Computer Science · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Psychology · Social Psychology · Work-Family Balance Challenges · Workaholism, burnout, and well-being

  • E‐Skill Self‐Efficacy and Perceived Performance in Remote Work

    Open Access•Nicoletta Massa, Valentina Sommovigo et al.•Human Behavior and Emerging…•2025

  • Techno-Stress Creators, Burnout and Psychological Health among Remote Workers during the Pandemic

    Open Access•Chiara Consiglio, Nicoletta Massa et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • The Impact of ICT on Quality of Working Life

    Open Access•Christian Korunka, Peter Hoonakker•The Impact of ICT on Quality of…•2014

  • Job Demands in a Changing World of Work

    Open Access•Christian Korunka, Bettina Kubicek•Job Demands in a Changing World…•2017

  • New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance

    Edwin A Locke, Gary P Latham•New Developments in Goal Setting…•2013

  • Pressed for Time

    Judy Wajcman•Pressed for Time•2014

  • Structural Equation Modeling with Mplus

    Barbara M Byrne•Structural Equation Modeling with…•2013

  • The Personal Costs of Citizenship Behavior

    Mark C Bolino, William H Turnley•Journal of Applied Psychology•2005

  • The Autonomy Paradox

    Melissa Mazmanian, Wanda J Orlikowski et al.•Organization Science•2013

  • The effect of estimation method and sample size in multilevel structural equation modeling

    Open Access•Joop J Hox, Cora J M Maas et al.•Statistica Neerlandica•2010

  • The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ)

    Frederick P Morgeson, Stephen E Humphrey•Journal of Applied Psychology•2006

  • Construct Clean‐Up in Proactivity Research

    Open Access•Katharina Tornau, Michael Frese•Applied Psychology•2013

  • Development and validation of the job crafting scale

    Open Access•Maria Tims, Arnold B Bakker et al.•Journal of Vocational Behavior•2012

  • RMediation

    Open Access•Davood Tofighi, David P Mackinnon•Behavior Research Methods•2011

  • The concept of personal initiative

    Open Access•Michael Frese, Doris Fay et al.•Journal of Occupational and…•1997

  • The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting

    Ravi S Gajendran, David A Harrison•Journal of Applied Psychology•2007

  • Common method biases in behavioral research

    Philip M Podsakoff, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2003

  • Smartphone use and work–home interference

    Open Access•Daantje Derks, Desiree van Duin et al.•Journal of Occupational and…•2014

  • Consequences of Boundary-Spanning Demands and Resources for Work-to-Family Conflict and Perceived Stress

    Patricia Voydanoff•Journal of Occupational Health…•2005

  • Work–nonwork boundary management profiles

    Open Access•Ellen Ernst Kossek, Marian N Ruderman et al.•Journal of Vocational Behavior•2012

  • Work–Family Boundary Dynamics

    Tammy D Allen, E Cho et al.•Annual Review of Organizational…•2014

  • Antecedents of work–family conflict

    Open Access•Jesse S Michel, Lindsey M Kotrba et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2010

  • A meta‐analysis of the antecedents of work–family enrichment

    Open Access•Laurent M Lapierre, Yanhong Li et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2017

  • Demands and Devotion

    Open Access•M Blair-Loy, E A Cech•Sociological Forum•2016

  • Measurement invariance conventions and reporting

    Open Access•Diane L Putnick, Marc H Bornstein•Developmental Review•2016

  • Flexible work designs and employee well‐being

    Open Access•Claartje L Ter Hoeven, Ward Van Zoonen•New Technology Work and Employment•2015

  • The influence of the Covid-19 pandemic on the digital transformation of work

    Open Access•Lisa Nagel•International Journal of…•2020

  • Work/Family Border Theory

    Open Access•Sue Campbell Clark•Human Relations•2000

  • Crafting a balance between work and home

    Open Access•Jane Sturges•Human Relations•2012

  • A resource perspective on the work–home interface

    Lieke L Ten Brummelhuis, Arnold B Bakker•American Psychologist•2012

  • Comparative fit indexes in structural models

    Peter M Bentler•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Conservation of resources

    Stevan E Hobfoll•American Psychologist•1989

  • Is There a Downside to Schedule Control for the Work-Family Interface

    Open Access•Schieman, Scott Schieman et al.•Journal of Family Issues•2010

  • Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit

    Open Access•Michael W Browne, Robert Cudeck•Sociological Methods & Research•1992

  • Blurring Boundaries? Linking Technology Use, Spillover, Individual Distress, and Family Satisfaction

    Open Access•Noelle Chesley•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2005

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae