Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reflexões sobre a preclusão do direito de provar no processo penal brasileiro

Bibliographic Data

ID16965623
AuthorsGisele Mara de Oliveira (0000-0003-3151-5245, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, corresponding author), Samia Saad Gallotti Bonavides (0000-0002-9413-2391, Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná), Luiz Gustavo Giuriatto Ferraço (0009-0000-1701-0625, Universidade Estadual de Maringá)
Year2024
Volume10
Issue2
Publication date2024-07-29
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRevista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2359-3881 • E-ISSN: 2525-510X
PublisherInstituto Brasileiro de Direito Processual Penal (PUBLISHER • BR)
DOI10.22197/rbdpp.v10i2.931
OpenAlexW4396923204
LanguagePT
Citations received1
References cited4

The article deals with the preclusion on the parties' evidentiary activity in criminal proceedings, in order to answer the following research problem: how can preclusion affect the parties' evidentiary activity in criminal proceedings? As a hypothesis, it was established that the principle of the presumption of innocence and the right to a broad defense can rule out the rules of preclusion applicable to the evidentiary activity carried out by the accused in criminal proceedings. The research was carried out in three stages, based on the constitutional and infra-constitutional rules applicable to the parties' evidentiary activity in criminal proceedings. Firstly, the study dealt with the preclusion in relation to the right to evidence. Secondly, it described the possible hypotheses of preclusion related to the parties' evidentiary activity in criminal proceedings. Finally, it sought to verify the possibility of preclusion occurring in criminal proceedings and in relation to the probative activity of the accused. Adopting the guidelines of the hypothetical-deductive method and explanatory approach, and based on the theoretical knowledge already published about the subject, the research led to the conclusion that the principle of the presumption of innocence and the right to a broad defense point to the inapplicability of preclusion in relation to the evidential activity carried out by the accused in criminal proceedings

Criminal procedure · Criminology · Political science · Sociology · Criminal Law and Evidence · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · International Law and Human Rights · Law

  • Reflexões sobre a preclusão do direito de provar no processo penal brasileiro

    Open Access•Gisele Mara de Oliveira, Samia Saad Gallotti Bonavides et al.•Revista Brasileira de Direito…•2024

  • Presunção de inocência e a doutrina da prova além da dúvida razoável na jurisdição constitucional

    Open Access•Ademar Borges de Sousa Filho•Revista Brasileira de Direito…•2022

  • Hermenêutica, prova e decisão

    Open Access•Michele Taruffo•Revista Brasileira de Direito…•2018

  • La prova nel processo penale

    Open Access•Paolo Ferrua•Revista Brasileira de Direito…•2018

  • Reflexões sobre a preclusão do direito de provar no processo penal brasileiro

    Open Access•Gisele Mara de Oliveira, Samia Saad Gallotti Bonavides et al.•Revista Brasileira de Direito…•2024

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae