EFL students’ learning and their perceptions of teacher humor
A mixed methods study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19224322 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Reza Taherkhani (0000-0003-1007-5180, Bu-Ali Sina University), Saba Aref (0000-0003-2225-5656, Bu-Ali Sina University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | AILA Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-0213 • E-ISSN: 1570-5595 |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/aila.24030.tah |
| OpenAlex | W7162496623 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 70 |
Humor has been reported to be beneficial for language learning. However, limited research has explored how different aspects of teacher humor — such as humor appropriateness and humor homophily — function together to influence various learning outcomes, particularly from the students’ perspective. The present study employed a mixed methods sequential explanatory design to explore students’ perceptions of teacher humor, humor appropriateness, and humor homophily as potential predictors of their cognitive learning, affective learning, and L2 achievement. Convenience sampling was used to recruit 298 EFL learners nationwide. Participants completed five questionnaires, and structured interviews were conducted with 23 students. Quantitative data were analyzed using multiple regression and path analysis, and thematic analysis with NVivo 12 was used for qualitative data. The results indicated that humor homophily was the strongest predictor of affective learning. Teacher humor, humor appropriateness, and humor homophily moderately predicted affective learning but had weaker predictive power for cognitive learning and L2 achievement. However, the concurrent use of different types of humor demonstrated higher direct effects on L2 achievement. Qualitative findings confirmed the quantitative results. By focusing on students’ perceptions, this study addresses a significant gap in the literature and provides context-specific insights into how humor can be strategically employed to support emotional engagement and language learning
Cognition · Homophily · Multimethodology · Path analysis (statistics) · Perception · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Thematic analysis · Humor Studies and Applications · Literacy, Media, and Education · Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R
Structural Equation Modeling and Regression
A Review of Humor in Educational Settings
Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments
Instructor–Student and Student–Student Rapport in the Classroom
Higher education for sustainability
Laughter among Colleagues †
An Explanation of the Relationship between Instructor Humor and Student Learning
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
PLS-Sem
Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.
Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling.
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
The Effect of Affect on Foreign Language Learning
Preliminary Verification of Instructional Humor Processing Theory
Perceived Homophily as a Predictor of Classroom Learning
Relevance of perceived teacher humor types for instruction and student learning
Humor as a pedagogical tool in foreign language and translation courses
Coloring social change
Effect of humor on state anxiety and math performance
Humor in British academic lectures and Chinese students’ perceptions of it
Nonverbal expectancy violations
A New Incremental Fit Index for General Structural Equation Models
Humor Scholarship and Tesol
Humor, Philosophy and Education
Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations
Humor as a Double-Edged Sword
Student smiles and the negotiation of epistemics in L2 classrooms
Causal role of trust in interpersonal attraction from attitude similarity
Mood Effects on Humor Production
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |