Assessment training effects on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer assessment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19378495 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Xiongyi Liu (0000-0001-5075-5629, Cleveland State University, corresponding author), Lan Li (0000-0002-0408-8615, Bowling Green State University) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 275-292 |
| Publication date | 2014-04-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0260-2938 • E-ISSN: 1469-297X |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02602938.2013.823540 |
| OpenAlex | W2328132595 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 20 |
| References cited | 38 |
This study examines the impact of an assessment training module on student assessment skills and task performance in a technology-facilitated peer assessment. Seventy-eight undergraduate students participated in the study. The participants completed an assessment training exercise, prior to engaging in peer-assessment activities. During the training, students reviewed learning concepts, discussed marking criteria, graded example projects and compared their evaluations with the instructor's evaluation. Data were collected in the form of initial and final versions of students' projects, students' scoring of example projects before and after the assessment training, and written feedback that students provided on peer projects. Results of data analysis indicate that the assessment training led to a significant decrease in the discrepancy between student ratings and instructor rating of example projects. In addition, the degree of student vs. instructor discrepancy was highly predictive of the quality of feedback that students provided to their peers and the effectiveness of revisions that they made to their own projects upon receiving peer feedback. Smaller discrepancies in ratings were associated with provision of higher quality peer feedback during peer assessment, as well as better revision of initial projects after peer assessment.Keywords: peer assessmentassessment trainingtraining effects
Higher education · Mathematics education · Medical education · Pedagogy · Peer Assessment · Peer evaluation · Peer feedback · Peer review · Self-assessment · Applied Psychology · Engineering · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Medicine · Psychology · Reflective Practices in Education · Student Assessment and Feedback
The Role Of Peer Assessment Model With A Web Platform In Participation And Learning Achievement Of Students
The impact of formative assessment on developing EFL student-teachers’ language competences as domain-specific
Peer and teacher assessment of second-language writing in high- and low-stakes conditions
Promoting Saudi University Students’ Experience Through Peer Assessment Practice
Designing Dialogic Peer Feedback in Collaborative Learning
Fair assessment as an aspect of effective teaching
Student peer review as a process of knowledge creation through dialogue
Exploring the reliability and its influencing factors of peer assessment in massive open online courses
Improving Accuracy of Self-and-Peer Assessment in Engineering Technology Capstone
Peer feedback modelling needs in online higher education
Exploring tertiary English as a Foreign Language writing tutors’ perceptions of the appropriateness of peer assessment for writing
The role of technology-facilitated peer assessment and supporting strategies
Synchronous discussion between assessors and assessees in web-based peer assessment
The effect of peer assessment on project performance of students at different learning levels
A robust approach for mapping group marks to individual marks using peer assessment
The role of anonymity in peer assessment
Small group discussion as a key component in online assessment training for enhanced student learning in web-based peer assessment
University students’ experience of ‘scale-referenced’ peer assessment for a consecutive interpreting examination
The Effects and Learners’ Perceptions of Cluster Analysis-Based Peer Assessment for Chinese Calligraphy Classes
Digital peer assessment in school teacher education and development
Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives.
Assessor or assessee
Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post‐secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. 1
Student revision with peer and expert reviewing
G*Power 3
EFL classroom peer assessment
The influence of peer feedback on self- and peer-assessment of oral skills
Development of a Peer Assessment Technique for Obtaining Individual Marks on a Group Project
Staff and Peer Assessment ‐ Measuring an Individual's Contribution to Group Performance
Issues in Assessment, Enterprise and Higher Education
Peer Assessment Training in Teacher Education
Formative Peer Assessment of Academic Writing Between Postgraduate Students
The Use of Exemplars and Formative Feedback when Using Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment
Peer and Teacher Assessment of the Oral and Written Tasks of a Group Project
An Examination of the Use of Peer Rating for Formative Assessment in the Context of the Theory of Consumption Values
Peer Assessment by Groups of Group Work
Tutor Versus Peer Group Assessment of Student Performance in a Simulation Training Exercise
Student perspectives on formative peer assessment
The Importance of Marking Criteria in the Use of Peer Assessment
Product Comparisons and Process Benefits of Collaborative Peer Group and Self Assessments
The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education
Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities
Staff and peer-group assessment of oral communication skills
Having second thoughts
Peer, self and tutor assessment
| Unique citing works | 20 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,82 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2025 (11) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 19 |