Management of paradoxical tensions in industrial symbiosis

An exploration at the inter‐organizational level

Bibliographic Data

ID19468242
AuthorsAlice Alosi (0000-0003-3219-5853, Institute of Management Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies Pisa Italy, corresponding author), Katrin Katana (0009-0001-4009-9872, Department of Management and Engineering Linköping University Linköping Sweden), Eleonora Annunziata (0000-0002-0261-5274, Institute of Management Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies Pisa Italy), Murat Mirata (0000-0002-6331-9890, Department of Management and Engineering Linköping University Linköping Sweden), Francesco Rizzi (0000-0001-6226-6320, Institute of Management Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies Pisa Italy), Marco Frey (0000-0002-4533-9599, Institute of Management Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies Pisa Italy)
Year2025
Volume29
Issue2
Pages602-616
Publication date2025-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Industrial Ecology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1088-1980 • E-ISSN: 1530-9290
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/jiec.13625
OpenAlexW4407619149
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited76

Industrial symbiosis (IS) is becoming a prominent inter‐organizational approach for improved resources utilization and reduced emissions. IS literature and development efforts focus on interventions needed to overcome or eliminate various barriers, but pay inadequate attention to paradoxes that cannot be suppressed over time and require management. This study combines literature on paradox theory and IS, exploring the identification and management of paradoxical tensions in eight case studies. The results show that IS relationships trigger paradoxical tensions at the strategic and operational levels, surfaced within and between the organizations. These tensions seem to emerge from, and connected to, the persistence of a cooperation–competition paradox within organizations, when engaging with IS partners contradicts with an organization's competitiveness on the market. The study also provides insights into paradoxical tension management within and between organizations in IS relationships by, for example, shifting partner expectations in favor of IS development, separating responsibilities for IS and core activities between departments, or addressing diverging objectives between partners over time. Both at organizational and inter‐organizational levels open dialogue, transparency, and collaboration appear to play key roles in tension management. The study emphasizes the pivotal role of active paradoxical tension management—both internally at strategic and operational levels and externally with partners and facilitators

Biology · Business · Economics · Environmental resource management · Industrial ecology · Industrial organization · Industrial Symbiosis · Knowledge management · Process management · Sustainability · Symbiosis · Chemistry and Chemical Engineering · Computer Science · Sustainable Industrial Ecology · Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Ecology · Paleontology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access