Trauma‐Informed Principles in Practice
A Mixed‐Method Study of Co‐Producing Systems Change With People Who Have Experienced Multiple Disadvantage
Bibliographic Data
BACKGROUND: Health and social care services increasingly recognise the value of involving people with lived experience in service design and delivery. For people who have experienced multiple disadvantage (combinations of homelessness, mental ill health, addiction, involvement with the criminal justice systems or domestic violence/abuse), participating in professional settings may be challenging and can risk re-traumatisation and greater disillusionment. However, gaining confidence and competency to do this offers opportunities for personal and professional development, contributing to meaningful change. It is necessary that individuals with lived experience can engage safely and effectively in these settings. This study analyses how an organisation of people who have experienced multiple disadvantage, Independent Futures (IF), enabled co-production within services and systems, to understand how people can be best supported and how involvement impacts them. METHODS: Sixteen IF members and three IF staff participated in semi-structured interviews. A staff survey, at two time points, investigated how employees from Changing Futures partner organisations perceived their ability to embed co-production within services, with 147 responses. Internal documentation was analysed to illustrate the diversity of co-production work that IF contributed to. RESULTS: Putting trauma-informed principles into practice facilitated personal growth, improved confidence and some work skills for IF members, who contributed to 65 different workstreams. However, embedding co-production into wider services and systems proved challenging. Staff survey comments highlighted obstacles related to resources, time and hierarchical cultures. CONCLUSION: Lived experience organisations can model trauma-informed practice and influence systems. Embedding trauma-informed principles requires flexibility, openness and willingness that is sustainable only when everyone adopts and commits to these principles. Any evidence of tokenism destroys trust and undermines the endeavour. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION STATEMENT: This study was co-produced with people with lived experience of multiple disadvantage and staff participants. Two lived experience IF members were involved in: developing the funding bid, designing the research including designing the staff survey, developing interview topic guides, commenting on information sheets and developing interview arrangements to ensure comfort and safety of IF members. Four lived experience IF members and three members of staff contributed to writing the paper, including reviewing key literature, refining the analysis and developing the discussion and conclusion
Developing country · Disadvantage · Information system · Lived experience · Qualitative research · Disability Rights and Representation · Down syndrome and intellectual disability research · Mental Health and Patient Involvement
What works in inclusion health
It takes Two to Tango? Understanding the C o‐production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives
Lost in the shadows
(Co)-Contamination as the Dark Side of Co-Production
The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS)
Target Article
Continuing the development of the public service logic
Engaging experts by experience as co-producers
A Compass for Navigating Relationships in Co-Production Processes Involving Vulnerable Populations
Special Issue- Engaging Vulnerable Populations in the Co-Production of Public Services
A Co-produced International Qualitative Systematic Review on Lived Experiences of Trauma During Homelessness in Adulthood and Impacts on Mental Health
Patient and Public Involvement in Research Evaluating Integrated Care for People Experiencing Homelessness
Research and recovery
Codesigning health and other public services with vulnerable and disadvantaged populations
Trauma‐informed co‐production
Learning from collective lived experience
An emergent process for activating system change
Navigating co-production with disadvantaged service users
Power dynamics and collaborative mechanisms in co-production and co-design processes
Beyond co‐production
Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction
Not the usual suspects
Contextualising co-production and complex needs
Mapping the "hard edges" of disadvantage in England
| Highly cited | No |
|---|