Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Compass for Navigating Relationships in Co-Production Processes Involving Vulnerable Populations

Bibliographic Data

ID21475432
AuthorsGillian Mulvale (0000-0003-0546-6910, McMaster University, corresponding author), Ashleigh Miatello (0000-0002-1254-8837, McMaster University), Jenn Green (0000-0001-7958-1714, McMaster University), Maxwell Tran (0000-0001-5503-613X, University of Toronto), Christina Roussakis (University of Toronto), Alison Mulvale (McMaster University)
Year2021
Volume44
Issue9
Pages790-802
Publication date2021-07-04
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Public Administration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0190-0692 • E-ISSN: 1532-4265
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01900692.2021.1903500
OpenAlexW3147741236
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited37

When it comes to engaging vulnerable populations in co-production, power imbalances across stakeholder groups can create methodological challenges. A thoughtful, planned, and responsive approach is needed to prepare vulnerable participants to fully engage in co-production processes. Data from key informant interviews (n = 16) and author reflections on three Experience-based co-design (EBCD) studies involving youth (16–25 years) with mental health issues in Ontario Canada, were analyzed. Four overarching themes and 12 subthemes were identified, and heuristic tools (a relational COMPASS and MAPS directions) were developed to assist researchers in navigating vulnerability, power and relational issues in co-production processes involving vulnerable populations

Cartography · Compass · Computer security · Geography · Mental health · Political science · Psychotherapist · Public relations · Sociology · Stakeholder · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Health Policy Implementation Science · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology

  • The promise of co-design for improving transit service for older immigrants

    Open Access•Shaila Jamal, K Bruce Newbold•Urban Governance•2023

  • Creative processes in co-designing a co-design hub

    Open Access•Samantha Micsinszki, Alexis Buettgen et al.•Evidence & Policy•2021

  • Mitigating unintended consequences of co‐design in health care

    Open Access•Éidín Ní Shé, Reema Harrison•Health Expectations•2021

  • Engaging Refugee Volunteers in Co-creation

    Open Access•Egzon Krasniqi•Voluntas Revista Internacional de…•2024

  • Making vulnerable groups able to connect socially and digitally—opportunities and pitfalls

    Open Access•Reidun Faye, Bodil Elise Ravneberg•Frontiers in Education•2024

  • Engaging experts by experience as co-producers

    Charlotte Van Dijck, Trui Steen•Public Management Review•2024

  • Understanding co-production with vulnerable populations

    Open Access•Angelica Zazzera, Denita Cepiku•Public Management Review•2026

  • Co-production with vulnerable people

    Open Access•Taco Brandsen, Marlies Honingh et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • Exploring Interactions in the Co-Production of Social Care Services with Vulnerable Citizens

    Eleonora Gheduzzi, Serena Barello et al.•International Journal of Public…•2025

  • Co‐Designing Aphasia Services

    Open Access•Lisa Anemaat, David A Copland et al.•Health Expectations•2025

  • ‘ Co‐Production Is Caring ’

    Open Access•Josimar Antônio De Alcântara Mendes, Ayan Mahamud et al.•Health Expectations•2025

  • Trauma‐informed co‐production

    Open Access•Helen McGeown, Lucy Potter et al.•Health Expectations•2023

  • Advancing a collective vision for equity‐based cocreation through prototyping at an international forum

    Open Access•Michelle Phoenix, Sandra Moll et al.•Health Expectations•2024

  • What Do We Know About Sharing Power in Co‐Production in Mental Health Research? A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis

    Open Access•India Hopkins, Max Verlander et al.•Health Expectations•2024

  • Trauma‐Informed Principles in Practice

    Open Access•Tracey Stone, Emily Eyles et al.•Health Expectations•2025

  • Engaging Crystallization in Qualitative Research

    Laura L Ellingson, Laura Ellingson•Engaging Crystallization in…•2009

  • The Dark Side of Co-Creation and Co-Production

    Open Access•Trui Steen, Taco Brandsen et al.•2018

  • Are you really doing ‘codesign’? Critical reflections when working with vulnerable populations

    Open Access•Sandra Moll, Michelle Wyndham-West et al.•BMJ Open•2020

  • Following the yellow brick road? (Dis)enchantment with co-design, co-production and value co-creation in public services

    Adina I Dudau, Russ Glennon et al.•Public Management Review•2019

  • Experience-based design

    Paul Bate, Glenn Robert•BMJ Quality & Safety•2006

  • Structural Vulnerability

    P Bourgois, M Holme et al.•Academic Medicine•2017

  • Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services

    Stephen P Osborne, Zoe Radnor et al.•Public Management Review•2016

  • Mental health service delivery in Ontario, Canada

    Open Access•Gillian Mulvale, Julia Abelson et al.•Health Economics Policy and Law•2007

  • On the Brink of Genuinely Collaborative Care

    Open Access•Michael Larkin, Zoë V R Boden et al.•Qualitative Health Research•2015

  • Enabling the participation of marginalized populations

    Open Access•Stephanie Montesanti, Stephanie R Montesanti et al.•Health Promotion International•2016

  • Codesigning health and other public services with vulnerable and disadvantaged populations

    Open Access•Gillian Mulvale, Sandra Moll et al.•Health Expectations•2019

  • Shared decision making for psychiatric medication management

    Open Access•Nicola Morant, Emma Kaminskiy et al.•Health Expectations•2016

  • Finding harmony within dissonance

    Open Access•Gillian Mulvale, Jenn Green et al.•Health Expectations•2021

  • Mutual powerlessness in client participation practices in mental health care

    Open Access•Tineke Broer, Anna P Nieboer et al.•Health Expectations•2014

  • Vagueness, power and public health

    Open Access•Amy S Katz, Billie-Jo Hardy et al.•Critical Public Health•2019

  • La madurez de la democracia deliberativa

    Open Access•James Bohman•Co-herencia•2016

  • New welfare ethics and the remaking of moral identities in an era of user involvement

    Alan Cribb, Sharon Gewirtz•Globalisation Societies and…•2012

  • The Participatory Zeitgeist

    V J Palmer, Wayne Weavell et al.•Medical Humanities•2018

  • Survey Article

    Open Access•James Bohman•Journal of Political Philosophy•1998

  • Power dynamics and collaborative mechanisms in co-production and co-design processes

    Open Access•Michelle Farr•Critical Social Policy•2018

  • The New Governance

    Open Access•Lisa Blomgren Bingham, Tina Nabatchi et al.•Public Administration Review•2005

  • Institutional predictors of developmental outcomes among racially diverse foster care alumni

    Antonio R Garcia, Peter J Pecora et al.•American Journal of Orthopsychiatry•2012

  • Beyond Engagement and Participation

    Open Access•T Bovaird•Public Administration Review•2007

  • Race, Culture, and Researcher Positionality

    Open Access•H R Milner•Educational Researcher•2007

  • Deliberative dialogues as a mechanism for knowledge translation and exchange in health systems decision-making

    Open Access•Jennifer A Boyko, Jennifer Boyko et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2012

  • Grounded Theory

    Open Access•Melanie Birks, Karen Hoare et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Co-designing Services for Youth With Mental Health Issues

    Open Access•Gillian Mulvale, Sandra Moll et al.•International Journal of…•2019

Citations per year3
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae