Gaps in the Engagement of People With Lived and Living Experience and Caregivers in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research
A Qualitative Study of Untapped Potential
Bibliographic Data
BACKGROUND: People with lived/living experience and family/caregivers (PLLEX-C) can be engaged in mental health and substance use health research in roles such as advisors, collaborators, and co-researchers. While there is a substantial body of research describing the barriers and facilitators to effective lived experience engagement, the actual contributions that PLLEX-C are making to the research remains under-explored. This qualitative descriptive study aimed to explore new areas where PLLEX-C can contribute to the research process. We wanted to understand gaps in the contributions of PLLEX-C and how we can provide opportunities to grow and enhance their contributions to the research in which they are engaged. METHODS: A Canada-wide sample of 28 PLLEX-C took part in one of five focus groups, while 12 researchers from across Canada took part in individual interviews using a co-designed semi-structured interview guide. Discussions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using codebook thematic analysis. We engaged PLLEX-C throughout the course of the study. RESULTS: Gaps in the engagement of PLLEX-C were found across the research lifecycle. This included key aspects of project initiation, like establishing research questions and priorities, contributing to grant applications, and contributing to ethics processes. Gaps were also encountered in the research operations process, in terms of recruitment processes and data analysis. Lastly, gaps at the end-of-grant knowledge translation stage included manuscript co-authorship and co-presentation at conferences or other events. CONCLUSIONS: PLLEX-C are willing to be engaged in research across the research lifecycle, but many have experienced areas of untapped potential. To develop appropriate engagement plans for a given project, it is important to have open discussions with the PLLEX-C engaged to understand their areas of skill, interest, and professional development goals, as well as barriers to full engagement in some stages of the project. This will make it possible to co-design a creative and flexible personalized engagement plan that is meaningful to them and maximizes their engagement potential. This process will ensure that authentic engagement overrides tokenistic practices. PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: This study was conducted on lived/living experience engagement and the team includes people with lived/living experience. A lived/living experience working group contributed to the design and operation of the project, as well as to data analysis, interpretation, and co-authorship
Lived experience · Mental health · Psychiatry · Psychotherapist · Qualitative research · Sociology · Substance use · Family Caregiving in Mental Illness · Health, psychology, and well-being · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology · Gerontology
Prevalence of comorbid substance use, anxiety and mood disorders in epidemiological surveys, 1990–2014
Stigma and mental health professionals
Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) in health care
Patient engagement in research
Research electronic data capture (Redcap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
Public and patient involvement in quantitative health research
An empirically based conceptual framework for fostering meaningful patient engagement in research
Lived experience and family engagement in psychiatry research
The benefits, challenges, and best practice for patient and public involvement in evidence synthesis
Co‐Authoring and Reporting on Lived Experience Engagement in Mental Health and/or Substance Research
Exploring the impact of engagement in mental health and substance use research
Best Practices Guidelines for the Engagement of People With Lived Experience and Family Members in Mental Health and Substance Use Health Research
Shortening and validation of the Patient Engagement In Research Scale (Peirs) for measuring meaningful patient and family caregiver engagement
Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient‐oriented research
Patient partners’ perspectives of meaningful engagement in synthesis reviews
Applying Patient and Public Involvement in preclinical research
Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |