The YouTube Apparatus
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19945543 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kevin Munger (0000-0002-4399-5250, Pennsylvania State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Publication date | 2024-05-31 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | YouTube Apparatus (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/9781009359795 |
| OpenAlex | W4396227411 |
| Open Library | OL51584396M |
| ISBN | 9781009359795 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 75 |
The academic agenda for studying social media and politics has been somewhat haphazard. Thanks to rapid technological change, a cascade of policy-relevant crises, and sheer scale, we do not have a coherent framework for deciding what questions to ask. This Element articulates such a framework by taking existing literature from media economics and sociology and applying it reflexively, to both the academic agenda and to the specific case of politics on YouTube: the Supply and Demand Framework. The key mechanism, traced over the past century, is the technology of audience measurement. The YouTube audience comes pre-rationalized in the form of Likes, Views and Comments, and is thus unavoidable for all actors involved. The phenomenon of 'radicalization' is best understood as a consequence of accelerated feedback between audiences and creators, radicalizing each other. I use fifteen years of supply and demand data from YouTube to demonstrate how different types of producers respond more or less to this feedback, which in turn structures the ideological distribution of content consumed on the platform. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core
Computer Science · Media Influence and Politics · Media Studies and Communication · Social Media and Politics
Amplifying Extremism
More than money and algorithms
The evolution of online news headlines
Participatory Policing
What Did We Learn About Political Communication from the Meta2020 Partnership
Negativity and Misinformation
The YouTube Apparatus
How News Coverage of Misinformation Shapes Perceptions and Trust
Left Populist Media Online
How does the education cleavage stack up against the classic cleavages of the past
Thirst Traps and Quick Cuts
The nerves of government
The Routledge Companion to News and Journalism
Misinformation and How to Correct It
Social Media and the Public Interest
Making the News
The Responsible Electorate
After Broadcast News
Making News at The New York Times
Impersonal Influence
Independent Politics
The Marketplace of Attention
Causal diagrams for empirical research
Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube
Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm – An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement
A postmodern Pandora's box
The Oxford Handbook of Political Communication
Amusing ourselves to death
Audience evolution
Degrees of Democracy
Personal Influence
Spreadable Media
The YouTube Apparatus
Hacking the Electorate
Economic News
Home Style Opinion
Democracy’s Detectives
Laboratory Life
What Drives Media Slant? Evidence From U.S. Daily Newspapers
Radical bubbles on YouTube? Revisiting algorithmic extremism with personalised recommendations
Right-Wing YouTube
This Is What the News Won’t Show You”
Autopsy of a metaphor
Down the (White) Rabbit Hole
Media Bias and Reputation
Two Faces of Media Attention
The End of Mass Communication
All the News That's Fit to Sell
News and Public Opinion
Anti-Intellectualism, Populism, and Motivated Resistance to Expert Consensus
All the News That’s Fit to Click
Changing Owners, Changing Content
Politicalcommunicationsowhite
Polisci Twitter
(Almost) Everything in Moderation
American Politics in Two Dimensions
The Public as Thermostat
Mere Description
Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments
A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication
The Duality of Media
Local News and National Politics
Competition and Truth in the Market for News
Should social science be more solution-oriented
Pluralistic Collapse
Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data
Communicology
The Drama of Metrics
The Limited Value of Non-Replicable Field Experiments in Contexts With Low Temporal Validity
Why Do Liberals Drink Lattes
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |