Team performance in cross cultural project teams

The moderated mediation role of consensus, heterogeneity, faultlines and trust

Bibliographic Data

ID20501366
AuthorsMerce Mach (0000-0002-0109-1122, Barcelona School of Economics), Yehuda Baruch (0000-0002-0678-6273)
Year2015
Volume22
Issue3
Pages464-486
Publication date2015-08-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCross Cultural Management An International Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1352-7606 • E-ISSN: 1758-6089
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/ccm-10-2014-0114
OpenAlexW1503255398
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited77

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to test the conditional effect of team composition on team performance; specifically, how collective team orientation, group consensus, faultline configurations and trust among team members explain the objective performance of project teams in cross-cultural contexts. Design/methodology/approach – Employing path analytical framework and bootstrap methods, the authors analyze data from a sample of 73 cross cultural project teams. Relying on ordinary least-squares regression, the authors estimate the direct and indirect effects of the moderated mediation model. Findings – The findings demonstrate that the indirect effect of collective team orientation on performance through team trust is moderated by team member consensus, diversity heterogeneity and faultlines’ strength. By contrast, high dispersion among members, heterogeneous team configurations and strong team faultlines lead to low levels of trust and team performance. Research limitations/implications – The specific context of the study (cross-cultural students’ work projects) may influence external validity and limit the generalization of the findings as well as the different compositions of countries-of-origin. Practical implications – From a practical standpoint, these results may help practitioners understand how the emergence of trust contributes to performance. It will also help them comprehend the importance of managing teams while bearing in mind the cross-cultural contexts in which they operate. Social implications – In order to foster team consensus and overcome the effects of group members’ cross-cultural dissimilarities as well as team faultlines, organizations should invest in improving members’ dedication, cooperation and trust before looking to achieve significant results, specially in heterogeneous teams and cross-cultural contexts. Originality/value – The study advances organizational group research by showing the combined effect of team configurations and collective team orientation to overall team performance and by exploring significant constructs such as team consensus, team trust and diversity faultline strength to examine their possible moderated mediation role in the process

Cooperative learning · Cultural diversity · Knowledge management · Management · Mediation · Moderated mediation · Psychological safety · Sociology · Team composition · Team effectiveness · Team learning · Teamwork · Computer Science · Conflict Management and Negotiation · International Student and Expatriate Challenges · Psychology · Social Psychology · Team Dynamics and Performance

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access