Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Affect and Fairness in Economics

Bibliographic Data

ID2065005
AuthorsFrans Van Winden (0000-0003-3713-2026, University of Amsterdam, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume20
Issue1
Pages35-52
Publication date2007-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Justice Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0885-7466 • E-ISSN: 1573-6725
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11211-007-0029-9
OpenAlexW2009199327
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited27

A strained relationship exists between mainstream economics and ethics. Over the last decade, behavioral economists have strongly argued for the importance of fairness in motivating behavior, based on substantial experimental evidence. Two main approaches to the modeling of fairness have been proposed: the outcome-based inequity aversion approach, and the intention-based reciprocity approach. Both approaches have been quite successful in explaining the experimental evidence. Nonetheless, this paper questions the role that is assigned to fairness in these models and the way fairness is incorporated, using recent experimental findings concerning emotions and fairness perceptions. The analysis supports the view that feelings are important for justice, also from a policy perspective, and pleads for closer attention being paid to the functioning of emotional brain systems

Affect (linguistics · Behavioral economics · Economic Justice · Economics · Experimental economics · Feeling · Inequality · Inequity aversion · Mainstream · Microeconomics · Normative · Perception · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Positive economics · Public economics · Reciprocity (cultural anthropology · Social policy · Computer Science · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Coupling and decoupling of unfairness and anger in ultimatum bargaining

    Open Access•Joydeep Srivastava, Francine Espinoza et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2008

  • A tractable model of process fairness under risk

    Open Access•Stefan T Trautmann•Journal of Economic Psychology•2009

  • Being of two minds

    Open Access•Dominique Cappelletti, Werner Güth et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2011

  • Affect and fairness

    Jonathan F Schulz, Jonathan Schulz et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2014

  • The Role of Contempt in Intercultural Cooperation

    Open Access•D Matsumoto, Hyisung C Hwang•Cross-Cultural Research•2015

  • Conflicting Loyalties

    Open Access•Gijs Van Houwelingen, D Ramona Bobocel et al.•Social Justice Research•2025

  • The Cognitive Structure of Emotions

    Open Access•Andrew Ortony, Gerald L Clore et al.•Cognitive Structure of Emotions•1988

  • A theory of reciprocity

    Open Access•Aliya Falk, Urs Fischbacher•Games and Economic Behavior•2006

  • Unfairness, Anger, and Spite

    Open Access•Madan M Pillutla, J Keith Murnighan•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1996

  • A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition.

    F Gregory Ashby, Alice M Isen et al.•Psychological Review•1999

  • The Neural Basis of Economic Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game

    Open Access•Alan G Sanfey, J K Rilling et al.•Science•2003

  • Erc

    Gary E Bolton, Axel Ockenfels•American Economic Review•2000

  • Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics

    Matthew Rabin•Advances in Behavioral Economics•2011

  • Passions within Reason

    John A Hall•End of the West?•2018

  • Inequity In Social Exchange

    J Stacy Adams•Adv in Expmtl Soc Psychol V2•1965

  • The impact of real effort and emotions in the power-to-take game

    Open Access•Ronald Bosman, Matthias Sutter et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2005

  • Estimating social and nonsocial utility functions from ordinal data

    Open Access•David M Messick, Keith P Sentis•European Journal of Social…•1985

  • When and why leaders put themselves first

    Open Access•David De Cremer, Eric Van Dijk•European Journal of Social…•2005

  • To "do the right thing" or to "just do it

    Arie W Kruglanski, Erik P Thompson et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2000

  • Emotional Hazard in a Power‐to‐Take Experiment

    Open Access•Ronald Bosman, Frans Van Winden•The Economic Journal•2002

  • Why Social Preferences Matter – the Impact of non‐Selfish Motives on Competition, Cooperation and Incentives

    Open Access•Ernst Fehr, Urs Fischbacher•The Economic Journal•2002

  • Fear, anger, and risk

    Jennifer S Lerner, Dacher Keltner•Journal of Personality and Social…•2001

  • Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts

    G Loewenstein, George F Loewenstein et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1989

  • A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation

    Ernst Fehr, Kari M Schmidt•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1999

  • Mood and judgment

    Joseph P Forgas•Psychological Bulletin•1995

  • Social Utility in Ultimatum Bargaining

    Open Access•Michel J J Handgraaf, Eric Van Dijk et al.•Social Justice Research•2003

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2008 - 2025 (18)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae