Shared scooter integration in multimodal networks
A time-cost accessibility analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21230463 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mohamed Abouelela (0000-0002-6186-7068, Technical University of Munich, corresponding author), María Vega-Gonzalo (0000-0002-8524-0307, Ingenieria Y Economia Del Transporte), Constantinos Antoniou (0000-0003-0203-9542, Technical University of Munich) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 130 |
| Pages | 106632 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sustainable Cities and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2210-6707 • E-ISSN: 2210-6715 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.scs.2025.106632 |
| OpenAlex | W4412558986 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 82 |
Shared scooters come to the urban environment with many optimistic promises and challenges regarding sustainability. In this work, we evaluate their impact on accessibility when used as a stand-alone mode or as a first–last–mode of public transportation, focusing on the inequalities that may arise across different socio-economic groups. Using real-world data from Austin, TX, and a cumulative opportunities approach, we analyzed different scenarios to explore the improvements in accessibility that shared scooters can bring about, considering travel time and budget. The overall view is that shared scooters can only improve accessibility if used as an access or egress mode to public transportation. In addition, the results show that this enhancement in accessibility doubles if the use of scooters to access public transport is fully subsidized. Considering the different types of activities and socio-economic segments, the analysis reveals that the accessibility enhancement is homogeneous. These findings suggest that subsidizing shared scooters can be an efficient way of increasing accessibility and equity, and we estimated the average yearly cost of subsidizing shared scooters for disadvantaged groups to be around $1.14 million. Nevertheless, suitable subsidizing schemes should be designed considering public transportation supply and urban structure in the different areas of the city. This would allow us to avoid positive discrimination and ensure that public resources are allocated to trips that cover mobility needs that the current transport systems cannot fulfill
Cost analysis · Operations research · Transport engineering · Computer Science · Engineering · Smart Parking Systems Research · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Urban Transport and Accessibility
Understanding willingness to use shared electric scooters for first- and last-mile travel in urban cities
A dynamic ordinal threshold framework for heterogeneous residential mobility under autonomous vehicle adoption
Integrated demand prediction and decision-making for user-incentive-based vehicle relocation in one-way car-sharing system
R5r
Built environment effects on the integration of dockless bike-sharing and the metro
The role of micro-mobility in shaping sustainable cities
Riders Under the Heat
Urban mobility in the sharing economy
Competition, Integration, or Complementation? Exploring Dock-Based Bike-Sharing in New York City
Sustainable E-scooter parking operation in urban areas using fuzzy Dombi based Rafsi model
Bike-sharing, car-sharing, e-scooters, and Uber
Investigating the association between neighbourhood characteristics and e-scooter safety
Siting charging stations and identifying safe and convenient routes for environmentally sustainable e-scooter systems
Big-data-driven approach and scalable analysis on environmental sustainability of shared micromobility from trip to city level analysis
Exploring the nuanced correlation between built environment and the integrated travel of dockless bike-sharing and metro at origin-route-destination level
Can shared micromobility programs reduce greenhouse gas emissions
E-scooters and sustainability
Enhancing Urban Energy Resilience
Electric scooter safety
Measuring Poverty
The prospects of fare-free public transport
Psychological factors impacts on carsharing use
A method to evaluate equitable accessibility
Is accessibility relevant in trip generation? Modelling the interaction between trip generation and accessibility taking into account spatial effects
Disparities in access to opportunities across neighborhoods types
Spatial analysis of shared e-scooter trips
Urban expansion and differential accessibility by car and public transport in the Greater Kumasi city-region, Ghana—A geospatial modelling approach
How much is accessibility worth? Utility-based accessibility to evaluate transport policies
Modeling choice determinants for bicycle-bus integration in developing countries
Transport problems that matter – social and psychological links to transport disadvantage
Evaluating the equity implications of ridehailing through a multi-modal accessibility framework
Evaluating equity and accessibility to jobs by public transport across Canada
Modelling travel time in urban networks
Investigation of modal integration of bike-sharing and public transit in Seoul for the holders of 365-day passes
Transport poverty meets car dependency
Shared micromobility as a first- and last-mile transit solution? Spatiotemporal insights from a novel dataset
Assessing transport related social exclusion using a capabilities approach to accessibility framework
Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies
Distance-decay functions for daily travel-to-work flows
A comparative analysis of the spatial determinants of e-bike and e-scooter sharing link flows
Poor People, Poor Places
Which factors influence the use of shared and privately-owned e-scooters in the city of Madrid? Implications for urban mobility
Ride-hailing and transit accessibility considering the trade-off between time and money
| Citations per year | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |