It’s all your fault! restaurant vs. platform blame attribution in food delivery service failures
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21295158 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sarah Lefebvre (0009-0003-5999-6930, Murray State University), Marissa Orlowski (0000-0002-2429-9209, University of Colorado Hospital), Laura Boman (0000-0002-9669-825X, Kennesaw State University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 126 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 3037-3050 |
| Publication date | 2024-07-23 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Food Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-070X • E-ISSN: 1758-4108 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/bfj-12-2023-1103 |
| OpenAlex | W4400651131 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 37 |
Purpose While third-party food delivery continues to increase in popularity, surveys suggest nearly a quarter of deliveries suffer from service failures. With the limited research on third-party food delivery, we explore the important questions of (1) where customers place blame in the case of service failures with third-party food delivery (i.e. the platform or the restaurant) and (2) does this depend on the type of service failure? Drawing on blame attribution theory, signaling theory, and an exploratory study, we demonstrate that customers typically perceive such mishaps to be the responsibility of the restaurant rather than the delivery platform itself. We also examine the effect of visible service failure preventative actions taken by the restaurant on blame attribution and re-order intention. Design/methodology/approach We conducted two online scenario-based studies to explore customer blame attribution in the case of third-party food delivery service failure. First, an exploratory study approach (N Study1 = 512 ) was taken to provide additional support for the hypothesis development. An experiment (N Study2 = 252 ) was then conducted to examine the hypothesized effects. Findings First, the results of an exploratory study demonstrate that customers attribute service failures such as wrong items, missing items, cold food, or leaking containers to restaurants over third-party food delivery platforms. Second, the results of an experimental study suggest inclusion of an observable cue indicating preventative action, such as time-stamp information indicating when an order was received and packaged for delivery, increases customer re-order intention through the underlying mechanism of blame attribution. Originality/value We contribute to the underexplored area of third-party food delivery service failure and to our understanding of blame attribution in service failure scenarios. Further, we demonstrate a practical method to shift the blame away from restaurants for service failures that are outside of the establishment’s control
Advertising · Attribution · Blame · Business · Food delivery · Food service · Service (business) · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Consumer Retail Behavior Studies · Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability · Marketing · Psychology · Social Psychology
Customer betrayal and retaliation
A Model of Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery
Customer Switching Behavior in Service Industries
Corporate social responsibility and consumers' attributions and brand evaluations in a product–harm crisis
Signaling Theory
Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Factors influencing customers' continuance usage intention of food delivery apps during Covid-19 quarantine in Mexico
Who loves to forgive? The mediator mechanism of service recovery between brand love, brand trust and purchase intention in the context of food-delivery apps
An analysis of a third-party food delivery app during the Covid-19 pandemic
Are vegans generous? An exploration of the success factors of vegan crowdfunding projects
The science on front-of-package food labels
Front-of-package food labels
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research
MTurk Character Misrepresentation
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |