Employee emotional competence and service recovery satisfaction
The mediating role of consumer forgiveness
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21295620 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rana Muhammad Umar (0000-0003-4747-5671, University of Udine, corresponding author), Salman Saleem (0000-0002-1026-139X, Tampere University of Applied Sciences) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 124 |
| Issue | 13 |
| Pages | 445-459 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-19 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Food Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-070X • E-ISSN: 1758-4108 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/bfj-04-2022-0386 |
| OpenAlex | W4297910340 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 46 |
Purpose Employees' emotional competence (EEC) is gaining increasing attention in service failure and recovery research. This study investigates the mediating role of consumer forgiveness between perceived EEC and recovery satisfaction among casual dining consumers. Additionally, this study examines the effect of perceived EEC on recovery satisfaction across process failure vs outcome failure. Design/methodology/approach A critical incident technique (CIT) in conjunction with a self-administered online survey was carried out. Using the snowball sampling technique, a total of 204 useable responses were collected. To test the hypotheses, this study used partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Findings The study finds that perceived EEC influences service recovery satisfaction. Additionally, the study identifies the mediating role of consumer forgiveness in the relationship between perceived EEC and recovery satisfaction. Multi-group moderation analysis shows that the relationship between perceived EEC and recovery satisfaction is weaker in process failures as compared to outcome failures. Practical implications Based on obtained results, this study recommends that after service failure consumer forgiveness and subsequent recovery satisfaction can be obtained with perceived EEC. To do so, managers need to incorporate emotional competence while recruiting and training the employees. Moreover, managers need to train employees on failure types and respective recovery strategies. Lastly, the study suggests that in emerging markets managers should pay greater emphasis on process failure, because such failure decreases customer satisfaction greatly than outcome failure. Originality/value To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study that investigates the impact of perceived EEC on consumer forgiveness which subsequently determines the recovery satisfaction in the emerging markets. It extends the application of the emotional contagion and affect infusion theories by exposing the effect of perceived EEC on recovery satisfaction through consumer forgiveness. In addition, the study provides insights that the influence of perceived ECC on recovery satisfaction significantly varies across service failure types
Business · Competence (human resources) · Customer satisfaction · Forgiveness · Moderation · Originality · Service (business) · Service quality · Service Recovery · Snowball sampling · Customer Service Quality and Loyalty · Emotional Labor in Professions · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Marketing · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology
How to repair customer trust after negative publicity
A Model of Customer Satisfaction with Service Encounters Involving Failure and Recovery
Emotional Contagion
Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments
A Longitudinal Study of Complaining Customers' Evaluations of Multiple Service Failures and Recovery Efforts
A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling
Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models
Customer complaint journey mapping
Sustainability and authenticity
Coffee in capsules consumers’ behaviour
Linking service employees' emotional competence to customer satisfaction
Mood and judgment
| Citations per year | 1.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |