Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Health beliefs, label orientation and consumer behaviour toward red and processed meats

Implications for sustainable diets in South Africa

Bibliographic Data

ID21295728
AuthorsOluwaseun Funmi Akinmoladun (Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, University of Medical Sciences Department of Human Nutrition and Dietetics), Olusegun Oyebade Ikusika (Faculty of Science and Agriculture, University of Fort Hare Department of Animal and Pasture Science), Oluwakamisi Festus Akinmoladun (0000-0001-6462-374X, Faculty of Science and Agriculture, University of Fort Hare Department of Animal and Pasture Science)
Year2026
Volume128
Issue13
Pages371-389
Publication date2026-12-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Food Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-070X • E-ISSN: 1758-4108
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/bfj-11-2025-1528
OpenAlexW7135061196
LanguageEN
References cited49

Purpose Growing health concerns are reshaping global dietary patterns, yet little is known about how consumers in sub-Saharan Africa perceive and respond to health information regarding red and processed meat. This study aims to examine how perceived health risk, health consciousness and label orientation influence consumers’ meat consumption behaviour. Design/methodology/approach A structured questionnaire was administered to 400 adult consumers across selected South African cities. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, factor and explorative analysis, correlation, multiple regression and mediation analysis (PROCESS Model 4). Findings Factor analysis identified two health-consciousness dimensions, label and outlet health/quality concern and product safety and welfare concern, explaining 39.2% of variance. Sociodemographic factors were significantly associated with label knowledge and preference for ethical products (p < 0.05). Health consciousness was positively associated with meat reduction (ρ = 0.375, p < 0.001), while perceived health risk correlated negatively with views of red meat (ρ = −0.178, p = 0.002). Regression analysis confirmed that health consciousness (β = 0.294, p < 0.001) and perceived health risk (β = 0.250, p < 0.001) independently predicted reduction in red meat consumption. In bivariate analysis, label orientation was positively associated with reduction intention (β = 0.16, p = 0.006). Mediation analysis further revealed that health consciousness significantly mediated the relationship between label orientation and meat reduction (indirect effect = 0.07, 95% confidence interval [0.03, 0.12]). Originality/value This article demonstrates strong originality by applying the health belief model to examine red and processed meat consumption within a sub-Saharan African context – a perspective rarely explored in existing literature. It uniquely integrates health risk perception, health consciousness and label orientation to explain consumer behaviour, offering fresh empirical insights beyond the predominantly high-income country focus. The findings challenge assumptions of uniform dietary transition patterns by showing that South African consumers tend to reduce rather than substitute meat intake in response to health concerns, thereby advancing understanding of cultural and contextual differences in sustainable diet adoption

Consumer behaviour · Consumption (sociology) · Context (archaeology) · Descriptive statistics · Mediation · Orientation (vector space) · Preference · Processed meat · Red meat · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling · Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability

  • Consumer perception and behaviour regarding sustainable protein consumption

    Open Access•Christina Hartmann, Michael Siegrist•Trends in Food Science & Technology•2017

  • Dynamics of the double burden of malnutrition and the changing nutrition reality

    Open Access•Barry M Popkin, Carlos Corvalán et al.•The Lancet•2020

  • European citizen and consumer attitudes and preferences regarding beef and pork

    Open Access•Wim Verbeke, Federico J A Pérez-Cueto et al.•Meat Science•2010

  • Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat

    Open Access•Véronique Bouvard, Dana Loomis et al.•The Lancet Oncology•2015

  • Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption

    Open Access•Ruben Sanchez-Sabate, Joan Sabate•International Journal of…•2019

  • Reducing meat consumption and following plant-based diets

    Open Access•João Graça, Cristina Godinho et al.•Trends in Food Science & Technology•2019

  • Meat consumption, health, and the environment

    Open Access•H Charles J Godfray, Paul Aveyard et al.•Science•2018

  • Making sense of the “clean label” trends

    Open Access•Daniele Asioli, Jessica Aschemann‐witzel et al.•Food Research International•2017

  • Food in the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Walter Willett, Johan Rockström et al.•The Lancet•2019

  • The Health Belief Model and Preventive Health Behavior

    Open Access•Irwin M Rosenstock•Health Education Monographs•1974

  • Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods

    Open Access•Sarah Campos, Juliana Doxey et al.•Public Health Nutrition•2011

  • A Systematic Review of Public Attitudes, Perceptions and Behaviours Towards Production Diseases Associated with Farm Animal Welfare

    Open Access•Beth Clark, Gavin B Stewart et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2016

  • Sustainable food

    Open Access•Fredrik Carlsson, Mitesh Kataria et al.•Ecological Economics•2022

  • WHO and for how long? An empirical analysis of the consumers’ response to red meat warning

    Open Access•Vincenzo Carrieri, Francesco Principe•Food Policy•2022

  • Gender differences in meat consumption and openness to vegetarianism

    Open Access•Daniel L Rosenfeld, A Janet Tomiyama•Appetite•2021

  • Too close to home. Factors predicting meat avoidance

    Open Access•Matthew B Ruby, Steven J Heine•Appetite•2012

  • Rationalizing meat consumption. The 4Ns

    Open Access•Jared Piazza, Matthew B Ruby et al.•Appetite•2015

  • Identifying barriers to decreasing meat consumption and increasing acceptance of meat substitutes among Swedish consumers

    Open Access•Elizabeth S Collier, Lisa-Maria Oberrauter et al.•Appetite•2021

  • Can graphic warning labels reduce the consumption of meat

    Open Access•Jan Andre Koch, Jan Willem Bolderdijk et al.•Appetite•2022

  • Replacement of meat by meat substitutes. A survey on person- and product-related factors in consumer acceptance

    Open Access•Annet C Hoek, Pieternel A Luning et al.•Appetite•2011

  • The influence of lifestyle on health behavior and preference for functional foods

    Open Access•Zoltán Szakály, N V Fedorenko et al.•Appetite•2012

  • Values, attitudes, and frequency of meat consumption. Predicting meat-reduced diet in Australians

    Open Access•Alexa Hayley, Lucy Zinkiewicz et al.•Appetite•2015

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae