Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sustainable production value vs self-oriented product value in driving organic beef consumption

A comparative analysis of China, the UK and Vietnam

Bibliographic Data

ID21296370
AuthorsAirong Zhang (0000-0002-9839-1032, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity), Peggy Schrobback (0000-0003-0526-1659, CSIRO Agriculture and Food), Thanh Mai Ha (0000-0001-6700-539X, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences), Christina Maxwell (0000-0002-5821-7515, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity), Nathan Kinch (0009-0004-1373-9338, Greater Than X), Barton Loechel (0000-0001-6441-4892, CSIRO Environment), Ningning Feng (0000-0003-4973-4817, East China Normal University)
Year2025
Volume127
Issue6
Pages2107-2128
Publication date2025-05-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Food Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-070X • E-ISSN: 1758-4108
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/bfj-02-2024-0124
OpenAlexW4408650542
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited74

Purpose This study examines how sustainable production values (e.g. environmental protection and animal welfare) and self-oriented product values (e.g. food safety, health benefit, superior taste, perceived availability, perceived high cost, and social norms) are evaluated by consumers and how these values influence willingness to pay (WTP) for imported Australian organic beef in three countries. Design/methodology/approach Online surveys were conducted in China (N = 1,303), the UK (N = 1,057), and Vietnam (N = 760) to measure the importance of sustainable production values and self-oriented product values for WTP for imported Australian organic beef using the contingent valuation method. Findings The findings highlight significant differences in participants’ assessment of these values and how these values influenced WTP between the three countries. Although sustainable production values were generally appreciated, they were considered less important in consumers’ purchasing decisions of organic beef than self-oriented product values. Practical implications The findings can help the meat industry effectively communicate with consumers to promote organic meat consumption. Though highlighting the sustainable attributes of organic meat is important, consumers’ self-oriented needs should be met first and foremost. Such communication must also consider the context of the targeted markets. Originality/value By examining the effects of sustainable production values and self-oriented product values on consumers’ purchasing decisions of organic beef, this study provides novel insights into how these values differently influence consumers’ purchasing decisions across diverse cultural contexts

Business · China · Consumption (sociology) · Context (archaeology) · Contingent valuation · Economics · Geography · Microeconomics · Originality · Product (mathematics) · Production (economics) · Purchasing · Qualitative research · Sustainable consumption · Sustainable development · Valuation (finance) · Value (mathematics) · Willingness to pay · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Marketing · Organic Food and Agriculture

  • Consumer trust in sustainable seafood certification agencies

    Open Access•Airong Zhang, Christina Maxwell et al.•Sustainable Futures•2026

  • Best-Worst Scaling

    Open Access•Jordan J Louviere, Terry N Flynn et al.•Best-Worst Scaling•2015

  • Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food

    Open Access•Jyoti Rana, Justin Paul•Journal of Retailing and Consumer…•2017

  • Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture

    Open Access•Adrian Müller, Christian Schader et al.•Nature Communications•2017

  • Intention-behaviour gap and perceived behavioural control-behaviour gap in theory of planned behaviour

    Open Access•Parves Sultan, Tasmiha Tarafder et al.•Food Quality and Preference•2020

  • Food Values

    Open Access•Jayson L Lusk, Brian C Briggeman•American Journal of Agricultural…•2009

  • The theory of planned behavior

    Open Access•Icek Ajzen•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1991

  • Influenced by Anonymous Others

    Hue Trong Duong, Hong Tien Vu et al.•Health Communication•2021

  • Purchase intention toward organic food among young consumers using theory of planned behavior

    Naveed Ahmed, Pearl Abredu et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2021

  • Emotional or logical

    Open Access•Heerah Jose, Vijay Kuriakose•British Food Journal•2021

  • Using Surveys to Value Public Goods

    Robert Cameron Mitchell•Using Surveys to Value Public Goods•2013

  • Determinants of organic food consumption. A systematic literature review on motives and barriers

    Open Access•Shiksha Kushwah, Amandeep Dhir et al.•Appetite•2019

  • Navigating sustainability trade-offs in global beef production

    Open Access•Adam C Castonguay, Stephen Polasky et al.•Nature Sustainability•2023

  • Are trust and consumption values important for buyers of organic food? A comparison of regular buyers, occasional buyers, and non-buyers

    Open Access•Van Anh Truong, Bodo Lang et al.•Appetite•2021

  • Social norms and their influence on eating behaviours

    Open Access•Suzanne Higgs•Appetite•2015

  • Measuring consumers’ knowledge of the environmental impact of foods

    Open Access•Christina Hartmann, Gianna Lazzarini et al.•Appetite•2021

  • Organic milk preference

    Open Access•Gabriele Scozzafava, Francesca Gerini et al.•Appetite•2020

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae