A comprehensive assessment of secondary school students’ computational thinking skills
Bibliographic Data
Performance in and perceptions of computational thinking (CT) are considered vital dimensions for comprehensively assessing CT skills of students. In this study, secondary school students’ CT performance and their perceptions were examined in terms of certain variables including gender, grade level, achievement and self‐efficacy. Casual‐comparative and correlational methods were used. The sample of the study consisted of a total of 328 fifth‐ and sixth‐grade (10–12 years old) secondary school students taking visual programming lessons. CT performance and perception tests were employed as data collection tools. The results show that CT performance of boys was higher than that of girls. A significant difference was found in both CT performance and perception depending on grades. The results show that achievement in math positively affected CT performance and perception. However, achievement in IT affected CT performance less than achievement in math. Implications are discussed in terms of theoretical insights, practices for improving CT skills in secondary schools and directions for further research. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic Due to the complex structure of computational thinking (CT) in association with computers, cognition, learning and psychology, CT skills should be evaluated from a variety of perspectives. CT performance and perception are considered vital dimensions for comprehensively assessing students’ CT skills. What this paper adds This paper proposes a CT performance test and a CT perception scale for secondary school students to explore their skills in terms of certain variables including gender, grade level and achievements in math and information technology (IT) courses. This paper provides some evidence that CT performance of boys is better than that of girls. A significant difference was found in both CT performance and perception depending on grades. The results of the study show that math course achievement positively affected CT performance and perception. However, IT course achievement affected CT performance less than math course achievement. Implications for practice and/or policy CT performance is affected by different variables. Therefore, it may be beneficial to include specific topics in the curriculum that involve the use of more CT skills. Girls’ interest and participation in practices such as programming can be encouraged. Teachers should provide students with cognitive scaffolding to help them and to have them collaborate with each other during CT activities, especially at higher grades. IT course content should include systematic and comprehensive CT activities to improve students’ CT skills. We suggest developing and implementing a holistic curriculum combined with IT and math lessons to improve students’ CT performance.
Achievement test · Casual · Mathematics education · Perception · Standardized test · Test (biology) · Educational Games and Gamification · Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research · Psychology · Teaching and Learning Programming
Cultivating thinking skills and computational thinking in higher education
Understanding the gender divide in digital literacy in four European countries
College of education students’ perceptions of their computational thinking proficiency
CTMath
Correlation between High School Students’ Computational Thinking and Their Performance in STEM and Language Courses
Gender Differences in Computational Thinking Skills among Primary and Secondary School Students
Exploring grade and gender differences in computational thinking skills
Flipping the switch
The cognitive effects of computational thinking
Effect of different mind mapping approaches on primary school students’ computational thinking skills during visual programming learning
Leveling the computational playing field
Latent profile analysis of primary students’ computational thinking concepts
Experimenting with computational thinking for knowledge transfer in engineering robotics
The Impact of Gender, Academic Performance, and Programming Ability on Computational Thinking
Relations between preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, computational thinking skills and metacognitive self-regulation
Exploring Self-directed programming learning of high school students
Effects of programming education mode on high school students’ computational thinking
Assessing implicit computational thinking in game‐based learning
Analysis of the relation between computational thinking skills and various variables with the structural equation model
Which cognitive abilities underlie computational thinking? Criterion validity of the Computational Thinking Test
Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM)
Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation
Demystifying computational thinking
Visual programming languages integrated across the curriculum in elementary school
Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment
Changing a Generation’s Way of Thinking
Bringing computational thinking to K-12
Computational thinking and thinking about computing
What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications.
Computational Thinking in K–12
| Unique citing works | 18 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 18 |