Adaptive or adapted to
Sequence and reflexive thematic analysis to understand learners' self‐regulated learning in an adaptive learning analytics dashboard
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21297490 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eunsung Park (0000-0002-2010-9957, Department of Curriculum and Instruction Tennessee Tech University Cookeville USA, corresponding author), Dirk Ifenthaler (0000-0002-2446-6548, Learning, Design and Technology University of Mannheim Mannheim Germany), Roy B Clariana (0000-0001-9374-0064, Department of Learning and Performance System The Pennsylvania State University University Park USA) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 98-125 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Educational Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1013 • E-ISSN: 1467-8535 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/bjet.13287 |
| OpenAlex | W4309325977 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 61 |
The real‐time and granularized learning information and recommendations available from adaptive learning technology can provide learners with feedback that is personalized. However, at an individual level, learners often experience technological and pedagogical conflicts. Learners have more freedom to accept, ignore or reject the feedback while also having the challenges of building learning strategies and utilizing learning information that requires self‐regulated learning skills. Given the conflicts, both understanding how learners learn and providing support for learners to be more self‐regulated in the learning environment are imperative. This investigation explores how learners processed their learning in an adaptive technology‐integrated learning analytics dashboard (ALAD). It employed mixed‐methods using a lens of self‐regulated learning (SRL). Three groups were identified based on clustering analysis of the learners' usage of warm‐up (WU) tests. Sequence analysis revealed the time trends of each group's interactions with course content. Reflexive thematic analysis brought insights on how learners built their learning strategies (eg, ways of using WU tests and submodule assessments) and how they monitored and controlled their learning. It showed their dynamic interactions with core adaptive learning analytics dashboard elements. Challenges such as difficulties in rehearsing and monitoring through segmented course content arose from the new structural changes. We suggest the need of future improvement to individual learning support through the learning analytics dashboard to be more diverse and dynamic (real‐time) over the course of learning while reducing potential undesirable consequences. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic One purpose of learning analytics and adaptive learning is to help learners identify learning goals and take action to achieve their goals. Learning analytics intervention showed support in learners' reflection phase SRL. However, it is not clear how to better support actionable and strategic changes to learning. Learning improvement through learning analytics interventions varies depending on how learners utilize feedback and monitor their learning progress, interacting with their digital learning environments. What this paper adds Learners established certain learning strategies with core adaptive learning analytics dashboard elements (eg, use of assessments, monitoring strategies). Learners' perceptions about learning support from the ALAD were built by interacting with the learners' task and cognitive conditions. Based on the perceptions, individuals' various SRL strategies and the need for diverse support were found. Monitoring and rehearsals can be challenging when course content is broken down for individuals' support. Implications for practice and/or policy Courses with adaptive learning analytics dashboards need to be designed more carefully, considering possible undesirable consequences, and to improve SRL support. Learners need more diverse learning support at an individual level based on how they interact with the learning environment.
Active learning (machine learning) · Adaptive Learning · Analytics · Collaborative learning · Cooperative learning · Dashboard · Data science · Knowledge management · Learning analytics · Mathematics education · Open learning · Personalized Learning · Qualitative research · Synchronous learning · Teaching method · Thematic analysis · World Wide Web · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · E-Learning and Knowledge Management · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Online Learning and Analytics · Psychology
Fostering self-regulated learning through adaptive learning technology
When Professions Meet GenAI
Taking adaptive learning in educational settings to the next level
Enhancing self-regulated learning in online environments
Evidence-based development of an instrument for the assessment of teachers’ self-perceptions of their artificial intelligence competence
The association between groups' interactions with the Visual-GenAI learning analytics feedback and student engagement in CSCL
Structured flexibility in microcredentials
Unfolding self‐regulated learning profiles of students
Dynamic Evolution of Self‐Regulated Learning Profiles in Blended Learning
Learning analytics and assessment
Crafting with AI
Self-assessment design in a digital world
The more official, the less I believe”
Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice
Perceiving Learning at a Glance
A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies on Learning Analytics Dashboards
Inherent details in self-regulated learning
Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds
A Theoretical Review of Winne and Hadwin’s Model of Self-Regulated Learning
Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning
Self-regulated learning partially mediates the effect of self-regulated learning interventions on achievement in higher education
A Review of Self-regulated Learning
The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulated Learning
Thematic Analysis
Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology
Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.
Item-level monitoring, response style stability, and the hard-easy effect
Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education
Towards strengthening links between learning analytics and assessment
Self-regulated learning support in flipped learning videos enhances learning outcomes
Informing learning design through analytics
Let’s not forget
Exploring Student Preference between Textbook Chapters and Adaptive Learning Lessons in an Introductory Environmental Geology Course
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis
Development of a Structured Interview for Assessing Student Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies
Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation
The Power of Feedback
Snowball Sampling
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |