Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cultivating science data literacy in K-16 science education through data practices

A systematic review

Bibliographic Data

ID21335938
AuthorsJina Kang (0000-0002-7043-5427, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, corresponding author), Chungsoo (0000-0003-3411-368X, Utah State University), Morgan Diederich (0000-0001-6895-8280, Utah State University), Hillary Swanson (0000-0001-5953-6780, Utah State University), Lili Yan (0000-0003-4491-1853, Michigan State University)
Year2026
Volume54
Issue2
Publication date2026-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInstructional Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-4277 • E-ISSN: 1573-1952
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11251-026-09803-5
OpenAlexW7162865560
LanguageEN
References cited83

As data science advances with the emergence of new computational technologies, science data literacy (SDL)—the ability to understand, use, and critically engage with data to address real-world scientific problems—becomes increasingly vital in science education. However, research on how data practices vary across scientific disciplines and educational levels remains limited, hindering the development of a more cohesive understanding of how SDL can be systematically integrated into diverse educational contexts. This review examines SDL by analyzing 42 peer-reviewed empirical studies (2000–2023) to investigate how students have been engaged in data practices across K–16 science education research. We identify seven core data practices: understanding problems, designing experiments, collecting data, cleaning data, analyzing data, and evaluating and disseminating results, along with their associated facets. Through frequency and association analyses, we observe systematic differences in how these practices are emphasized across disciplines, grade levels, and data types. The reviewed studies suggest that engagement in data practices is associated with both cognitive and non-cognitive learning outcomes. Building on established characterizations of scientific inquiry and problem-solving, along with frameworks such as NGSS and GAISE, we conceptualize SDL as a multifaceted and iterative process, encompassing dimensions from problem identification to data analysis, result synthesis, and dissemination. These dimensions illuminate how scientific knowledge is developed, critiqued, and communicated, which is critical for STEM workforce preparation. Lastly, we identify key challenges evident in the literature and outline directions for future research to support interdisciplinary and sustained approaches to SDL

Best practice · Discipline · Educational psychology · Educational research · Identification (biology) · Literacy · Science education · Scientific Literacy · Workforce development · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Research Data Management Practices · Statistics Education and Methodologies

  • How we think.

    John Dewey•1910

  • Pico, Picos and SPIDER

    Open Access•Abigail M Methley, Stephen Campbell et al.•BMC Health Services Research•2014

  • Building a Conceptual Framework for Data Literacy

    Open Access•Edith S Gummer, Edith Gummer et al.•Teachers College Record The Voice…•2015

  • Representing Student Argumentation as Functionally Emergent From Scientific Activity

    Open Access•Eve Manz•Review of Educational Research•2015

  • Addressing the epistemic elephant in the room

    Open Access•Emily Adah Miller, Eve Manz et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2018

  • The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions

    Open Access•Alessandro Liberati, Douglas G Altman et al.•Journal of Clinical Epidemiology•2009

  • The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

    J R Landis, Gary G Koch•Biometrics•1977

  • Strengthening Data Literacy in K-12 Education

    Open Access•Verena Witte, Angela Schwering et al.•Education Sciences•2024

  • Macrosystems Eddie Teaching Modules Increase Students’ Ability to Define, Interpret, and Apply Concepts in Macrosystems Ecology

    Open Access•Alexandria G Hounshell, Kaitlin J Farrell et al.•Education Sciences•2021

  • Explicit Instruction of Scientific Uncertainty in an Undergraduate Geoscience Field-Based Course

    Open Access•Kathryn M Bateman, Cristina G Wilson et al.•Science & Education•2022

  • Emotion, place, and practice

    Open Access•Kathryn Lanouette•Science Education•2022

  • Methodological Guidance Paper

    Open Access•Patricia A Alexander•Review of Educational Research•2020

  • Evaluating the apt epistemic processes of data literacy in elementary school students

    Open Access•Amanda M Cottone, Susan A Yoon et al.•Instructional Science•2023

  • A learning analytics approach towards understanding collaborative inquiry in a problem‐based learning environment

    Open Access•Asmalina Saleh, Tanner Phillips et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2022

  • An empirical analysis of high school students' practices of modelling with unstructured data

    Open Access•Shiyan Jiang, Antonino Nocera et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2022

  • Students' actual purposes when engaging with a computerized simulation in the context of citizen science

    Open Access•Michal Dvir, Dani Ben‐Zvi•British Journal of Educational…•2022

  • Young Adults’ Understanding and Use of Data

    Open Access•Engida Gebre•Canadian Journal of Science…•2018

  • Bridging sustainability science, earth science, and data science through interdisciplinary education

    Open Access•Deana Pennington, Imme Ebert‐Uphoff et al.•Sustainability Science•2019

  • Personal data literacies’

    Open Access•Luci Pangrazio, Neil Selwyn•New Media & Society•2018

  • Inquiry in the Physical Geology Classroom

    Heather Miller, Heather R Miller et al.•Journal of Geography in Higher…•2010

  • Using computational essays to foster disciplinary epistemic agency in undergraduate science

    Open Access•Tor Ole B Odden, Devin W Silvia et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2022

  • A Systemic View of Implementing Data Literacy in Educator Preparation

    Open Access•Ellen B Mandinach, Edith S Gummer et al.•Educational Researcher•2013

  • How Can Educators Confront Science Denial

    Open Access•Rebekka Darner•Educational Researcher•2019

  • A Call for a Humanistic Stance Toward K–12 Data Science Education

    Open Access•Victor R Lee, Michelle Wilkerson et al.•Educational Researcher•2021

  • Modeling Natural Variation Through Distribution

    Open Access•Ronald Lehrer, Richard Lehrer et al.•American Educational Research…•2004

  • Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

    Open Access•Hsiu-Fang Hsieh, Sarah E Shannon•Qualitative Health Research•2005

  • A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Muhammad Naeem, Wilson Ozuem et al.•International Journal of…•2023

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae