Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Lower secondary intended curricula of science subjects and mathematics

A comparison of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Poland and Slovenia

Bibliographic Data

ID21345554
AuthorsPetr Kácovský (0000-0003-0675-6098, Charles University), Tereza Jedličková (0000-0003-0260-9293, Charles University), Radim Kuba (0000-0001-9614-9675, Charles University), Marie Snětinová (0000-0003-4164-3160, Charles University), Petra Surynková (0000-0002-4370-3916, Charles University), Matěj Vrhel (0000-0002-9008-3385, Charles University), Eva Stratilová Urválková (0000-0002-8629-3582, Charles University, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume54
Issue3
Pages384-405
Publication date2022-05-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Curriculum Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-0272 • E-ISSN: 1366-5839
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00220272.2021.1978557
OpenAlexW3203096345
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited39

Comparative studies on science curricula provide insights into educational standards worldwide. Accordingly, in this study, we analysed the intended curricula of mathematics and science subjects of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Poland and Slovenia by comparing their lower secondary (ISCED 2) National Curriculum Documents on mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, geography and geology from the perspective of learning outcomes. By document analysis, we extracted obligatory learning outcomes from the national curricula, assessing their level of detail and structure. A team of seven coders also measured cognitive demands of the learning outcomes using the revised Bloom's taxonomy. Our results showed considerable differences in the number of learning outcomes across countries and in the structure of these outcomes across subjects, even within national documents. Cognitive demands determined by learning outcomes were similar across the countries, but metacognitive knowledge and cognitive processes of higher level (Evaluate and Create) were mostly overlooked. We also found a lack of learning outcomes explicitly requiring the use of ICT, experimental or field work or data analysis. Although these requirements are usually formulated in general sections of curriculum documents, we recommend explicitly incorporating them into these documents as individual learning outcomes

Cognition · Curriculum · Czech · Mathematics education · Metacognition · National curriculum · Pedagogy · Science education · Educational Assessment and Pedagogy · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Open Education and E-Learning · Psychology

  • Curricular Progression for Linear Function from Primary School

    Open Access•Akira Oshima, Satoshi KUSAKA•International Journal of Science…•2026

  • Evaluating Primary-Level English Textbooks of Single National Curriculum through the Lens of Bloom's Taxonomy

    Open Access•Irshad Ahmed•PAKISTAN LANGUAGES AND HUMANITIES…•2023

  • Czech and Slovak intended curricula in science subjects and mathematics

    Open Access•Petr Kácovský, Tereza Jedličková et al.•International Journal of Science…•2024

  • Estimating Epistemic Practices Loads in Elementary and Middle School Science Curricula

    Open Access•Yilmaz Soysal•Science & Education•2025

  • Physics curriculum in upper secondary schools

    Open Access•Vojtěch Žák, Petr Kolár•Science Education•2023

  • Operationalizing the concept of indoctrination

    Open Access•Jennifer Bleazby•Journal of Curriculum Studies•2026

  • Pisa 2018 Results (Volume I)

    OECD OECD•Pisa 2018 Results (Volume I)•2019

  • Pisa 2015 Results (Volume I)

    OECD OECD•PISA 2015 Results (Volume I)•2016

  • The Research Act

    Norman K Denzin•The Research Act•2017

  • Comparative Analysis of the Science Teaching Curricula in Turkey

    Open Access•Ömer Volkan Yaz, Mehmet Altan Kurnaz•SAGE Open•2020

  • Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method

    Open Access•Glenn A Bowen•Qualitative Research Journal•2009

  • Elite Knowledge for the Masses

    David H Kamens, Aaron Benavot•American Journal of Education•1991

  • Metacognition and cognitive monitoring

    John H Flavell•American Psychologist•1979

  • A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy

    David R Krathwohl•Theory Into Practice•2002

Unique citing works6
Citations per year2
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae