The effects of unexpected changes to content delivery on student learning outcomes
A psychological contract perspective during the Covid‐19 era
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21376282 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michele W Gazica (0000-0003-3714-2873, Behavioral and Social Sciences Department Embry‐Riddle Aeronautical University Prescott Arizona USA, corresponding author), Grace D Leto (Behavioral and Social Sciences Department Embry‐Riddle Aeronautical University Prescott Arizona USA), Andrea L Irish (0000-0001-5501-2437, Behavioral and Social Sciences Department Embry‐Riddle Aeronautical University Prescott Arizona USA) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 1473-1491 |
| Publication date | 2022-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychology in the Schools (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-3085 • E-ISSN: 1520-6807 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/pits.22685 |
| PMID | 35572172 |
| OpenAlex | W4220821244 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 39 |
Meta‐analyses suggest that student learning outcomes (SLOs) are comparable across modalities of instruction. None of these studies examined how unmet student expectations (here, unexpected changes in course delivery) might increase perceptions of student–instructor‐university psychological contract breaches (PCBs) and, ultimately, perceived SLOs within and across modalities. The COVID‐19 pandemic provided an opportunity to study these potential relationships because many residential institutions of higher education opted into, or were required to, offer distance and/or blended learning to accommodate COVID‐19 safety mandates. This study sampled undergraduate students ( n = 155) from a university, which, before the pandemic, offered exclusively face‐to‐face classroom instruction. During the Fall 2020 semester, however, this university offered three modalities of instruction: (1) face‐to‐face; (2) blended learning; and (3) distance education. The results of this study suggest that perceived PCBs by instructors and universities negatively influence underling indices of student achievement in terms of motivation, engagement, and learning within and across modalities of instruction. Given this and near universal decrements in student enrollment and retention in institutions of higher education, it is important for universities and instructors to understand, explicitly and transparently negotiate, and meet student expectations to improve student progression to graduation and maintain competitiveness among similar institutions
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Content (measure theory) · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Medical education · Pedagogy · Perspective (graphical) · Psychological contract · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Medicine · Online and Blended Learning · Psychology · Social Psychology
Building bridges
Psychological and implied contracts in organizations
How motivation affects academic performance
A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education
Effective Teaching Practices for Success During Covid 19 Pandemic
The effects of unexpected changes to content delivery on student learning outcomes
The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education
How Important are High Response Rates for College Surveys
Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys
An Institutional Response to Changing Student Expectations and their Impact on Retention Rates
Exchange and power in social life
What does the student psychological contract mean? Evidence from a UK business school
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,75 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |