Investigating the Role of Word Knowledge Components in Chinese L2 Writing Ability

Bibliographic Data

ID21439397
AuthorsChangyong Min (0009-0006-1226-470X, Mahasarakham University), Apisak Sukying (0000-0002-2553-0433, Mahasarakham University)
Year2024
Volume30
Issue4
Pages273-290
Publication date2024-12-11
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
Venue3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0128-5157 • E-ISSN: 2550-2247
PublisherPenerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM Press) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.17576/3l-2024-3004-19
OpenAlexW4405210911
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited21

A body of research has looked into the nature of multiple-word knowledge components in recent years. However, the individual role of these components in L2 writing proficiency still remains unclear. The present study examined the interrelations between six-word knowledge components and explored the relationships between the lexical components and productive word use and L2 writing ability. The study adopted a multi-task approach using the word knowledge framework by Nation (2013, 2022) and the model of word knowledge components required in writing proposed by Coxhead (2007). Six measures, including one receptive word component (overall word size) and five productive depth knowledge components (productive form and meaning, association, productive derivation and collocation), were designed and validated to measure 147 Chinese EFL university learners’ word knowledge relative to their word use and argumentative writing ability. The correlation and regression results demonstrated that derivative form production was the best predictor of word use and L2 writing ability. Its contribution was even stronger than productive form and meaning, though the latter two were also closely related to L2 writing and word use. Association and collocation predicted less variance yet still correlated with productive skills. However, the receptive size measured by the VLT had no correlations with L2 writing and lexical proficiency. Overall, t his study provides empirical evidence for the theoretical word knowledge models and yields nuanced ideas regarding the smallest lexical predictors of L2 writing. Pedagogical implications for EFL vocabulary pedagogy are also discussed. Keywords: Chinese EFL university learners; L2 writing ability; multiple word tests; word knowledge components; word size and depth

Linguistics · Natural language processing · Word (group theory) · Computer Science · Philosophy · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access