Seeing Through the Fog
The Ability to Resolve Ambiguity Reduces Dishonesty
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21453935 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Puntiroli (0000-0002-4541-7294, University of Neuchâtel, corresponding author), Serhiy Kandul (0000-0001-8175-2252, University of Zurich), Valéry Bezençon (0000-0002-1670-3179, University of Neuchâtel), Bruno Lanz (University of Neuchâtel) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1299-1313 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0146-1672 • E-ISSN: 1552-7433 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/01461672241305687 |
| PMID | 39764593 |
| OpenAlex | W4406125284 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 54 |
Ambiguity acts as a veil that can help conceal and justify dishonest behavior. While an individual’s ability to disambiguate information in a task may help remove the veil of ambiguity and thus promote honesty, the relationship between ambiguity, ability, and dishonesty is currently unexplored. To investigate this, we employed an experimental design where participants attempted to resolve an ambiguous task and reported their performance. Results showed that ambiguity and dishonesty increase in unison. Importantly, the participants who resolved ambiguity acted less dishonestly (Study 1). In Studies 2a, 2b, and 3, we increased participants’ ability by briefly training them to disambiguate the information presented in the task. The results showed that participants acted less dishonestly when their ability levels were increased. Overall, the findings indicate that dishonesty can be reduced not only by making tasks less ambiguous but also by enhancing an individual’s ability to successfully resolve ambiguity
Ambiguity · Dishonesty · Computer Science · Ethics in Business and Education · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
Negotiating Peace
Honesty Requires Time (and Lack of Justifications)
Justified ethicality
Self-Serving Justifications
The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior
Moral awareness and ethical predispositions
Exploiting moral wiggle room
Self-Efficacy
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
Dehumanization
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1
Improving Ethics
Rule Following Mitigates Collaborative Cheating and Facilitates the Spreading of Honesty Within Groups
Cheating at the Top
Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect
Self-efficacy
Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being
Interpersonal behaviour and social perception in a hierarchy
Let’s be honest
Ignorance by choice
Why Do People Need Self-Esteem? A Theoretical and Empirical Review
What Provides Justification for Cheating—Producing or Observing Counterfactuals
Honest mistake or perhaps not
Taxpayer information assistance services and tax compliance behavior
The Unintended Consequences of Changes in Beverage Options and the Removal of Bottled Water on a University Campus
Crime and Punishment
See what you want to see
Daring dishonesty
The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences
Loss framing increases self-serving mistakes (but does not alter attention)
Don't remind me
What lies beneath
Ordinary magic
Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance
Expert and Exceptional Performance
Representative evidence on lying costs
Ethical Fading
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |