Using a most significant change approach to evaluate learner-centric outcomes of clinical scholars leadership training program
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21457229 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ellison Henry (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, corresponding author), Madison R Walker (0000-0002-7642-530X, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Cheryl C Noble (0000-0002-0694-2571, Bethany University), Claudia S P Fernandez (0000-0002-3884-6787, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Giselle Corbie-Smith (0000-0003-0737-6775, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Gaurav Dave (0000-0003-0825-1595, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 94 |
| Pages | 102141 |
| Publication date | 2022-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Evaluation and Program Planning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0149-7189 • E-ISSN: 1873-7870 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102141 |
| PMID | 35905523 |
| OpenAlex | W4285402903 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 18 |
BACKGROUND: Most significant change (MSC) analysis is an evaluative method used to supplement outcome and impact program evaluations. MSC stories provide mini-narratives contextualizing the effect a program had on an individual. The Clinical Scholars program evaluation team used MSC to explore learner-centric leadership outcomes of the Clinical Scholars leadership training program. PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH: To identify thematic outcomes of trainees during the three years of their leadership training in the Clinical Scholars program. RESULTS: We identified three central thematic areas of most significant change: (1) leadership in practice, (2) self-awareness, and (3) equity, diversity, and inclusion. Other present themes included stakeholder engagement, effective leadership, collaboration, impact, expanded influence, innovation, networking, community engagement, evidence-based, implementation science, organizational development, hope, and advocating within organizations, teams, and the community. A total of 25 mid- and advanced-career level participants represented a diverse array of disciplines within the healthcare sector. CONCLUSIONS: MSC stories represented leaders' individual and team growth due to participating in the Clinical Scholars program. Results confirmed fidelity of program implementation to the original program goals, as outlined in the grant proposal. They highlighted three critical areas of development for this cohort of Fellows
Diversity (politics) · Diversity training · Fidelity · Health care · Inclusion (mineral) · Leadership development · Medical education · Narrative · Political science · Program evaluation · Public relations · Qualitative research · Sociology · Stakeholder · Thematic analysis · Engineering · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health Sciences Research and Education · Innovations in Medical Education · Medicine · Psychology
Interpretive approaches in nursing research
Doing Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis
Evaluating leadership development using the Most Significant Change technique
Fourth-Generation Evaluation
Methodology for the Human Sciences
A Dialogical, Story-Based Evaluation Tool
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Public Health Leadership Training
Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |