Digital self‐control interventions for distracting media multitasking ‐ A systematic review

Bibliographic Data

ID21499396
AuthorsDaniel Biedermann (0000-0001-9219-222X, Information Center for Education DIPF Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education Frankfurt am Main Germany), Jan Schneider (0000-0003-4454-6710, Information Center for Education DIPF Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education Frankfurt am Main Germany), Hendrik Drachsler (0000-0001-8407-5314, Information Center for Education DIPF Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education Frankfurt am Main Germany)
Year2021
Volume37
Issue5
Pages1217-1231
Publication date2021-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Computer Assisted Learning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0266-4909 • E-ISSN: 1365-2729
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/jcal.12581
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited50

Digital distractions can interfere with goal attainment and lead to undesirable habits that are hard to get red rid of. Various digital self‐control interventions promise support to alleviate the negative impact of digital distractions. These interventions use different approaches, such as the blocking of apps and websites, goal setting, or visualizations of device usage statistics. While many apps and browser extensions make use of these features, little is known about their effectiveness. This systematic review synthesizes the current research to provide insights into the effectiveness of the different kinds of interventions. From a search of the ‘ACM’, ‘Springer Link’, ‘Web of Science’, ’IEEE Xplore’ and ‘Pubmed’ databases, we identified 28 digital self‐control interventions. We categorized these interventions according to their features and their outcomes. The interventions showed varying degrees of effectiveness, and especially interventions that relied purely on increasing the participants' awareness were barely effective. For those interventions that sanctioned the use of distractions, the current literature indicates that the sanctions have to be sufficiently difficult to overcome, as they will otherwise be quickly dismissed. The overall confidence in the results is low, with small sample sizes, short study duration, and unclear study contexts. From these insights, we highlight research gaps and close with suggestions for future research

Tools

Open DOI