Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Using Narrative Medicine Workshops to Improve Empathy and Emotional Intelligence and Address Burnout Among Medical Students

Bibliographic Data

ID21615355
AuthorsAndrew Childress (0000-0002-4587-6941, Baylor College of Medicine, corresponding author), Andrew M Childress (Baylor College of Medicine), E Lee Poythress (Baylor College of Medicine), Reginald Toussant (Baylor College of Medicine), Andrea Stolar (0000-0002-1713-4481, Baylor College of Medicine), Larry Laufman (Baylor College of Medicine), Nital Appelbaum (0000-0001-8369-5722, Baylor College of Medicine), Ricardo Nuila (Baylor College of Medicine)
Year2022
Volume97
Issue11S
PagesS120-S120
Publication date2022-11-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAcademic Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1040-2446 • E-ISSN: 1938-808X
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/acm.0000000000004863
OpenAlexW4307498946
LanguageEN
References cited3

Purpose: Recognizing that a supportive environment can mitigate the negative psychological effects that occur in training, educators seek to develop programs that cultivate empathy and interpersonal skills, while reducing burnout. 1 Narrative medicine is a pedagogical approach that facilitates the development of interpersonal and noncognitive aspects of medical professionalism, and potentially strengthens relationships. 2 In 2019, Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) School of Medicine developed a mandatory Narrative Medicine (NM) course. The course spans spring of second year through fall of third year of medical school. Sponsored in part by an AAMC grant, our research assesses how participation in the NM course affects burnout, empathy, and emotional intelligence. This study was approved by the IRB at BCM. Approach: Between March and October 2021, 5 cohorts of medical students were divided into small groups (4–12 students/group; mean 8.5 students/group) to engage in six, 1- to 1.5-hour narrative medicine workshops following their surgery clerkship. Faculty facilitators led these workshops primarily through Zoom. All faculty members were given training in both narrative medicine and workshop facilitation before leading the sessions. During the workshops, participants were asked to closely read creative pieces, write freely in response to prompts, share their written reflections, and respond thoughtfully to one another’s work. Students were emailed pre- and post-surveys with program evaluation questions, along with study-related scales with evidence of validity/reliability (Interpersonal Reactivity Index 3 (IRI) to measure empathy, Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey for Students 4 (MBI-GS[S]), and Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form 5 (TEIQue-SF). Statistical analyses included paired samples t tests, reliability (Cronbach’s alpha), and effect size (Cohen’s d) for differences between pre- and postintervention measures using SPSS version 27. Outcomes: One hundred fifty-three out of 162 students (94.4%) across 19 small groups met inclusion criteria for our survey study. Scales demonstrated adequate reliability (alpha = .61–.92). Across the 3 constructs, there were statistically significant improvements for the following scales/subscales: IRI – Total Score (P = .001), Empathic Concern (P = .008), and Perspective Taking (P = .001); MBI-GS(S)—Professional Efficacy (P = .035); and TEIQue-SF—Total/Global Emotional Intelligence (P = .015), Emotionality (P = .042), Self-Control (P = .005), and Well-Being (P = .005). Several subscales showed no improvement. The effect sizes (Cohen’s d) for significant differences between means were small, ranging from 0.116 to 0.339. Significance: This project provides evidence that a relatively short (approximately 9 hours of workshop time per group) narrative medicine intervention for second-year medical students can have a positive impact on their self-reported empathic concern and perspective taking, professional efficacy, and emotional intelligence. Despite the lack of improvement on some subscales and the small effect size, the “dose” of narrative medicine was itself fairly small yet produced positive results. As a “proof of concept,” the study demonstrates the potential and measurable contribution of narrative medicine to the medical school curriculum. While the narrative medicine course was a short, concentrated experience, future investigation includes testing additive effects of multiple activities targeting wellness, empathy, and emotional intelligence longitudinally across the continuum of medical education. These findings show that narrative medicine is an effective pedagogical tool for teaching students how to deepen their emotional connection to patients. By developing skills of close reading and attention, students learn to take on others’ perspectives and develop empathic concern for others’ feelings. These skills easily translate into the clinical environment where students will be able to draw on their emotional intelligence and empathy to improve their communication with patients and colleagues.

Burnout · Emotional exhaustion · Emotional intelligence · Empathy · Faculty Development · Graduate medical education · Interpersonal communication · Interpersonal Reactivity Index · Medical education · Narrative · Narrative medicine · Perspective-taking · Professional development · Clinical Psychology · Empathy and Medical Education · Film in Education and Therapy · Innovations in Medical Education · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Measuring individual differences in empathy

    Mark H Davis•Journal of Personality and Social…•1983

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae