Applications of the bifactor S-1 model to adult ADHD symptoms
Evaluating the role of hyperactivity/impulsivity and associations with emotional regulation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21624630 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rapson Gomez (0000-0001-7637-1551, RMIT University), Daniel Zarate (0000-0002-1508-8637, RMIT University, corresponding author), Brian Hunt, Brian R Hunt (0000-0003-0779-9866, RMIT University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Current Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1046-1310 • E-ISSN: 1936-4733 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12144-025-08567-4 |
| OpenAlex | W7124548856 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 53 |
The structure of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in adults has been the subject of recent research. The primary goal of the study was to examine the S-1 bifactor model, with impulsivity (IM) symptoms as the reference indicator for the general factor, and the relevance of hyperactivity symptoms (HY) for ADHD in an adult community sample. A total of 539 adults (males = 143, females = 393), aged between 18 and 65 years, completed the Current Symptom Scale and the Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Strategies-36. The S-1 bi-factor model showed good global fit, with the general factor (indexed by IM symptoms) and the inattention-specific factors (IA; indexed by the inattention symptoms) showing a clear structure and sufficient reliability. The HY factor (indexed by the HY symptoms) did not. Additionally, the general factor and the IA-specific factor were significantly associated with emotion dysregulation (ED), whereas the HY-specific factor was not. These findings support the external validity of the general ADHD-impulsivity reference factor and the IA factor, but not the HY factor, thereby questioning the clinical utility of HY symptoms in adult ADHD. Furthermore, an extended ADHD S-1 bifactor CFA model, with IM as the reference indicators for the general factor and specific factors for IA, HY, and ED, showed that the ED indicators had relatively low (though significant) loadings on the general factor and relatively high loadings on the ED-specific factor. These results suggest that ED is better conceptualized as an associated feature, rather than a core feature, of ADHD
Emotional dysregulation · Emotional Regulation · Factor analysis · Impulsivity · Psychometrics · Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Emotion Dysregulation in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Scoring and Modeling Psychological Measures in the Presence of Multidimensionality
Anomalous results in G-factor models
The descriptive epidemiology of DSM-IV Adult ADHD in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys
Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research
Cronbach’s α , Revelle’s β , and Mcdonald’s ω H
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Multidimensional Assessment of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation
Emotion Regulation
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |